You didn’t really read or comprehend what i wrote, did you?
First of all, i wrote
I’m not going into whether this event is actually dumb
which means that i didn’t make any comment that this event is so cool, easy or whatever, quite the contrary : I explicitly said that with that post i did not make any statement whether i think this event is good or bad, easy or hard. So i don’t get why you even talk to me about that aspect.
Secondly, if you read carefull what i wrote then you’d see that i objected to the use of the words “officially” and “confirmed”.
In order for “this event is bad” to be official you need someone of authority from the IMC company to actually say it, and if you use the word “confirmed” you actually need another person to confirm that official statement.
If he had just said “This is the dumbest event ever” i wouldn’t have objected, but he claimed it was “officially the dumbest event ever”, meaning he supposedly can quote someone from IMC who said that, and he claimed that he also has confirmation for that official statement.
But he didn’t but only used these words to get more attention for his topic, hence why i said this is a clickbaity buzzwordy topic title.
Words, they actually mean things. Use them properly.
Oh no, someone else used similar words in a similar sentence? Shock and horror! That never happened before! Clearly that means that i used it in the same context, meaning and with the same intention of that other person. Also the validity and applicability of that other persons statement must be equal to the validity and applicability of my statement, just because we used similar words!