Tree of Savior Forum

Announcement Regarding Changes in Plans (Poll Closed)

I am sorry, if the time to play is being reduced why is the price tag the same as before between the different packs options?
EDIT: Also for those actually interested in the price per month the winner is obviously the 49.99$ for 3 month’s access.

BTW… i really feel i need to ask this.

Do you have a ton of premade pictures ready for use or you have someone that draw them for you at light speed everytime you guys change the banner? :stuck_out_tongue:

The game was announced as f2p, so, 1st choice is for f2p players…We all know that game is going to be p2w, so 2nd choice is the worst cause:

  1. players will pay for benefits since game starts and they will do it again and again = p2w
  2. after p2w options will be gone, your servers wouldnt be crowded enough to have fun, u will play with same p2w players and part of them will start playin on new servers cause they want p2w
    Options that imc gave us force ppl to vote for 2nd choice cause ppl r dumb…

Why the hell do ppl think that the 1 month option would delay the release of the game? Are you guys serious? That makes no sense!
The 2nd option is obviously the best one. It gives the oportunity for every1 to join in and the best possible scenario to test the servers and give the proper amount of time for a fix. It’s also not a huge amount of time, so I dont think ppl would restrain from entering thr 1 month old server.

:smile_cat:
sounds good for me!

Because “founder pack” is not related to “early access time”

Is it possible to buy this plan and play after June 19th? What about items and TP? We can claim all items only in Founder’s server or any server later? OR we need to choose server at checkout page?

I like this game, but don’t see any reason pay money for beta game.

So this was edited in the other post.
March 22 date isn’t certain after all…

Back to option C!

We need more info. Option C, March 22.

All I am saying is why would someone pay 49.99$ For a week or a month when they can do it for 3 months. Option C seems to be the clear winner.

Is this guy for real?
Uploading…

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Thank you for listening, Option #2 is exactly we needed. Doesn’t stagger access (1 month for all) and, instead, the benefits feel like a bargain rather than feeling mandatory.

Lesson learned, psychology of marketing is important over here :stuck_out_tongue:

Because if you do it for three months then:

  • almost all the F2P player will give up on the game thus making IMC lose 50%-80% pplayers/potential customers
  • lot of P2P players will NOT be founders because their friends will not be playing with them
  • if you go check other game in the market the “early access” time is about 3 days

plus in the 1 month offer as a paying player you get a TON of nice stuff more to compensate for the two months.

It really is about making the larger amount of people happy at the same time.

Because they said this

There are 2 known starting dates March 22 and June 19. How can those dates stay “similar” (just as vague as “soon”) “regardless of which option is chosen”.

Why even keep this information from us?

1 Like

This part i can answer even if i’m not from the staff. Eu server wasn’t an intention at the begining but seeing how many player are asking for it they already stated in an announcment that the matter is under internal debate and they’ll let us know as soon as they decide something.

1 Like

You people should had done the option B from the start, even if it was 3 month EA. You will earn more money that way.

Then again, if those F2P players give up on the game that is their own choice, I have been waiting like 4 months, since I last played that is, for this. A few more months won’t kill the game for me to be honest.

The sooner you release the game (payable or not) the better. We just want to play it, that’s all. Thank you for this obviously attractive game.