nuli*** ban scenario doesn’t seem to need that kind of requirements for a thorough investigation if you ask me owO;;
and with the common elements found from the reports, it’s easy to find where they’ll make an appearance for an in game investigation
and just as @Ersakoz indicated, the investigation conditions seem to fluctuate when it comes to reaction-time and effort
what i was trying to convey is that these varying reaction from the investigation team needs to be standardized, else it will bring up stuff in the long run
things like
- players would believe the linhs are telling the truth due to them not being punished for such a long time.
thanks to people who misunderstood me and branded me as a supporter, real supporters have been asking me about whether if it’s true or not. imagine how devastated those players sound like after telling them that the linhs have betrayed their trust all this time and is now conflicted between being happy for getting rid of a cheater and being sad that they’ve lost someone they trust (it may sound ideal that people would accept the truth and move on, but that is not the case for them, factors like how long they were made to believe their story plays a major part in their struggle)
- now, that they are proven guilty, the elapsed time they are left alone create questions within the community. not everyone is in this culture of forgetfulness where everyone will be satisfied the moment they get a favorable result from a local scenario, and not consider details that will affect the big picture
sure i would understand imc is understaffed, but considering it is a major exploit (even bob thinks that it greatly affect the economy) that ran for that long seems a little way out of that scope for that excuse