See, thereâs the thing.
I am a cbt2 player. I tested out a priest3/sadhu1/druid build asap and even have the feedback listed in this thread.
Hence I am saying sadhu benefits to much of druid to pass up on.
Did you ever try an invuln based sadhu? If you didnât then by your logic you donât have the right to speak either.
And I have a cleric2/priest/sadhu2/druid as we speak. I know full well how possession works as I leveled with it for ages.
All I lack experience with is the dmg scaling of possession/extra range of OoB and Transmit Prana. And even then my planned druid3 would do more dmg with possession, so 1/3th is irrelevant.
OoB range I donât care about since sadhus can achieve said impunity in other ways.
And @BlaXun even went to the trouble of documenting how transmit prana works for us.
Nor were any of those 3 aspects vital to your argument. You just like insisting going sadhu3 gives specific insight that makes all our points moot.
Even though you canât put it into words.
And I will not build a sadhu3 in itâs current state to begin with.
I know in the possession focus department a druid3 will be vastly superior. (doubled mag attack but 500 less skill scaling. Extra health, invulns, dmg etc.)
I know in the pd2 + cc department Iâd rather go with a diev2-3+miko+pd2 as it has a permanent aoe silence, far better damage and tons more utility. Granted world tree has a longer cd.
All you are proving is:
- Youâre unwilling to prove your claims. (Which is a lot easier to prove on your side of the argument btw)
- Youâre far too eager to dismiss (and ignore) any arguments those that disagree with you.
- You donât know the slightest bit about what synergy sadhu does have, considering your frequent 0 synergy statements.
- Your builds arenât representative of what this class can achieve.
I am not saying your opinions are unwelcome here.
I am however saying that any advice and posts that will mislead new players into a ruined build are unwelcome in the tos community at large.