So much wrong with your post, but you’ve proven unwilling to listen to any opinions outside your own.
Paladin’s attack skill has a 9 second cooldown. So what is paladin supposed to do, just sit there twiddling his thumbs while smite is on cooldown? Absurd.
Many skills are often resisted. Sleep, hex, freeze, cure, heal etc. So do you recommend people never take or cast these skills? Ridiculous!
But what irritates me the most is your refusal to admit that you are wrong about chaplain builds.
What is this gibberish? I just got done explaining to you all the skills that scale with int. Cure, Heal, Mass Heal, Aspersion, Exorcism, Aspergillum, ME. You selected at least some of these skills in your skill build. It’s literally IMPOSSIBLE to create a chaplain without investing points in at least 1 skill that scales with int.
Here’s a list of Cleric/Priest/Chaplains skills that scale with str:
Str/dex is bad for chaplain, period. 1 chaplain swing = 5 hits. Base, cafri, sacra, last rites, asper. Str/dex ONLY impacts hit #1. That’s it. By saying this works, you are actively encouraging people to build bad characters. The best scaling by far of those 5 attacks is aspergillum/aspersion because you can increase its damage by 100% with attribute. There is no auto attack attribute.
I DID EXPLORE AND TEST IT. I can log on RIGHT NOW and show you my chaplain in action. Where is your testing? Where is your chaplain? That’s what I thought. Pure theorycraft and youtube, zero actual experience.
Btw, that 170 damage bless you were just criticizing? 850 damage for a chaplain swing. That’s the equivalent of 850 strength, without wasting all of your stat points to get it. I seriously don’t understand how you can recommend a strength build for chaplains in the same post that you’re criticizing bless. Are you intentionally trying to troll people into ruining their characters?
Right, so you are the problem. Since you have never played chaplain or monk, and have no idea what you are talking about. Meanwhile I have one of each and you are accusing me of speaking on assumptions.