Before anything else: yeah, i understand people can or can’t agree with me, that’s why I take the time to reply to you. What bothers me is that you take sentences out of context and say whatever you want as if I was saying the opposite. That is lack of understanding.
And ugh… now I see your point, even tho I don’t share it. If you are considering “tree of solo” yeah, Hands>>Enchant. But why would you take CryoKinoEnch as a solo (farming??) class over something like QS or Linker+some nuke? If it is “because of fun” we don’t even need to argue, because “for fun” i can skip both buffs and use a dagger to hit everything. Or take a rainbow build and run all over the maps swinging my weapon and doing ok damage. There is not really a big point in optimizing a “for fun” build.
If it is about efficiency, we don’t need talk about solo play, we need builds with synergies with other buils/classes for high level coordinated play. Of course if you are alone you won’t spend 1k on Enchant when you can burst with empowered autoattaks for free. That’s why Enchanters are not using all their skills outside of dungeons.
And, no, I would not take Sage ONLY for Missile Hole, but it’s a great plus when it comes to party.
About your other comments: Yeah, I agree with PP, that’s why I had it just as a side note. It sucks is most cases when you have a lot of better options.
And please, would you define a filler for me? because afaik a filler is something you use when everything (or pretty much everything) is on cd. In this case, will you use Hands before GP, HG, MF (all Kino skills) or Snow rolling, Pike or Pillar from Cryo?? I guess not, that’s why I called it a filler. If you would do that, why taking Kino in the first place? If you wanted to mainly autoattack, why not a ThaumaChrono build instead?
And THIS exactly is what I think. What is even the point of playing the “tree of solo” when most of the high level contet is made for full parties? Besides of farming I mean.
).
.