ye just expect the worst which is why im thinking what @atari posted is what the gm is saying lol.
Yea its once in a while but its still a in favor option. If you increase the number of in favor options and have less options for against your literally forcing a bias as it makes more people pick the in favors as the options. If you believe me or not is irrelevant, it doesnât make what im saying any less true.
Then you can tell the OP to add it, I told him, he did.
A simple suggestion actually helps rather than offending, no?
But really, against or for, anyone with the right mind will see it as the same thing.
âNo to class resets on cash shop, unless theyâre only for eventsâ
âYes to class resets but only on occasional basis like eventsâ
Iâd vote either.
This just makes the poll longer with redundancy
If you simply want a direct ânoâ option, itâs in the poll.
⌠you seriously donât understand what im saying. Just because you put no in front of something doesnât make the statement against that would just be adding more in favor options skewing it even more lol.
What he needs its for options = against options. He lacks against options for players that might be against it for balance concerns / pvp / or exploit issues etc. And when people donât see a option that they like they just pick the closest thing even if it would move them from a against to a restricted for because their option isnât available. And having for : against at 6:1 creates that in plentiful amounts.
Yeah this is the exact problem that I do not want to encounter on lvl 300+
We need at least an rest for the latest two circles.
Hmmm? You really should. I doubt it would be a big difference and would just make the poll look more redundant with votes scattered. It already is now and this poll is pretty much OK to me.
Yea no â â â â . Thats why most people do a poll with
1 For
1 Neutral
1 Against
then ask people to post why they chose each.
Right now this poll is the equivalent of having of having 2 doors one open and one locked with a poisons snake in front of it. Then when the results come in wondering why everyone chose the open door lol.
welp. which part?
as if ad hominem arguments are proper arguments. lels.
I donât see the âYouâre an idiot, and people need to stop asking such idiotic questionsâ option.
Iâm gonna give a bit of a different perspective. I already quit the game a couple of weeks back but I hopped on the forum since I saw a post about a GM hinting at class reset on reddit. Iâd like to see this only because it would make me give the game another chance. I was actually pretty happy about my high level characters but I wouldnât mind trying something new (especially since I have 2 over lvl 200 archers). Itâd be fun to try a new build and potentially get back into the game again.
Iâm sure Iâm not alone in this, and Iâm sure there are plenty of people who have been gone for way longer who would come back for a class reset (just like Iâm sure there are people with 280s who will come back for Rank 8 for a bit). My point is, I think it has the potential to bring back at least a small chunk of the player base, but it might not be a permanent fix as the same problems that made people leave in the first place might still persist shrug
Lol, I see what you did there.
Between the bias in this thread and the bias in my thread and then the fake thread on this subject right in the middle of it, it all evens out and leads us to a clear and single answer.
I donât need to write of it. The clever know.
What are you doing then?
Joke about resets in the world chat (Or I guess so. The screenshot is too crappy) + âGood newsâ from a FB page = Proof.
At least 2 members of the staff are now aware about confirmed stat resets.
At the same time official statement in the QnA section isnât a proof.
Deluding yourself because you want those resets is ok. This doesnât work on me however.
Iâve seen so many thread like this before. My opinion about this has changed.
I have a suggestion tho. Class reset should only work on Rank 6 and above. Once class reset is used, an item will be placed in your inventory that contains experience that will make your class level to 15 (stats will not reset). The class reset item can only reset 1 rank which is your current.
So for example, youâre at rank 7 and you want to change your Rank 6 and 7 class, youâll be using the class reset item and youâll have 2 items that contains exp to reach class 15 for Rank 6 and 7.
However, if the class reset means resetting from Rank 1, then i might disapprove on that reset idea. It will totally ruin the games concept.
1: Actually, if youâre talking personnaly, Iâm for this system and I hope itâll be done.
2: Iâve been in a lot of staff teams, and it was recurrent to say things that will make players think about it, so we see their reactions. If itâs good or bad, we know which decision to take without consequences, because we havenât confirmed anything.
3: Some problems occurred with the FB, like recently, they said themselves about the optimisation of the game, when a player was asking, âWeâve corrected the FPS issues.â, which is absolutely false.
4: Obviously itâll happen, this doesnât harm anyone if they do it correctly, and a lot of people want it.
They did say something, but they havenât confirmed it, thatâs my point since I want the reset, a confirmation, not âMaybe, weâll see, thereâs a surpriseâ. I donât want to be hyped for nothing.
A confirmation would be a clear âPlayers will now have the possibility to reset their circlesâ.
try again. learn how to read next time, ok?
inb4 someone assumes I believe whatever proof they have on reset being confirmed.
There in lies my concern with this system because of how the class system works in this game class resets are ripe for exploit. And for them to implement it âcorrectlyâ it would require a mass of restrictions and limitations to prevent. And at that point would it even be worth implementing?
IMC: "class reset is not an easy task"
atari: IMC intends to NEVER implement class reset. it has been set in stone. spouts nonsense everywhere
i rest my case
Alright, so you didnât defend my irrefutable proof that you defined the statement absolutely wrong, glad to see you admit it.
Even more funny is you think that two different staff members would collectively lie like itâs a huge prank. I mean, if they did, that would be pretty funny, but at that point itâs going to them more worse than good by lying about a popular topic to the player base.
Deluding yourself that âitâs not happeningâ is hilariously sad. Cringe worthy even. You canât even think straight and youâre just spewing any form of ammo you could fire without even thinking how easily refutable they are.