Tree of Savior Forum

Paladin Build Compendium and FAQ [Updated 29/04/2016]

IMO cleric c2 is enough because
cleric c2 curse have 30 hit
cleric c3 curse have 38 hit

I think 8 hit that really waste and curse is pretty long cd. you can get another class at c3 example : krivis for zaibas, boker for effigy or another choice.
If you interesting magic dps druid is better kabalist but kabalist is good support class you can choose if you need support team.

For TU i recomment lv2 is enough or more but lv15 for sacrifice smite I think that not good idea because TU have HUGE LONG CD. and after you cast TU you can spam with smite. smite is good for every build don’t worry about physical dmg for int build, It pretty good enough for use them.

Basically, Alice, it’s just me. I’m obsessed with C3s.

Yep, people learn everyday haha. I’ll stick to maces (judging you, Smite and elemental bonuses) until more classes are revealed.

Is their a reason for no Sacrament?

Is Cleric>Krivis>Krivis>Paladin>Paladin>Paladin>X viable? I like the Krivis/Paladin playstyle with Smite/Zaibas/Zalciai. I like to be able to buff myself and hit hard, can I do that?

If it’s viable, should I go STR/CON/DEX or something else?

I would really appreciate some guidance because I’m a little lost at the moment and I already started Cleric>Krivis2 (which I like, if the paladin way is to gimpy I’ll try druid but I would really prefer to go the paladin route).

Thanks ahead for the answers.

@jffmferraz I wouldn’t go for Paladin route without Cleric c2 but since you already skipped it at rank 2 and 3 I can’t recommend it.

If you statted full SPR you have a few options. But my favourite right now would be:

Krivis c3 > Pardoner > Kabbalist. I can send you the build in PM if you’re curious about it.

Yes I’m curious, I would appreciate if you were to send me the build. Is druid also viable with what I already have?

Full-Support Gimmick Build

Actually this is kind of a gimmick build and not garenteed to work. I only know one person who is doing this because we had a conversation about what to do as a cleric c2 > krivis c3 with full-spr.

We came up with this build discussing his full-spr Cleric c2 > Krivis c3.

I just want to say sorry for wasting your time with that passing thought. But there are other options. The better option being to go Cleric c2 > Monk c3 to capitalize on that high base damage. You can be somewhat supportive and a healer while doing some dps.


Monk PvE Support + Kamehameha

Energy Blast scales amazingly well with INT but costs a lot of SP. You won’t need STR because you’ll already have high skill base damage and zalciai to debuff enemies.

INT - Increases your Energy Blast and Zaibas damage as well as your heal tiles.

SPR - Increases your mana pool, gives you a greater damage and higher chance to crit with zalciai debuffing enemies and bosses. You can still do significant damage to bosses this way.

DEX - If you only focus on PvE you don’t really need DEX at all.

CON - Always have high CON as a Cleric. Especially as a melee build.


Plate Armor attribute - for 2.5k extra hp

Catacomb Mace gives you +300 magic attack and decent physical attack for Energy Blast Damage and Zaibas. Also gives +1500 hp. You will need it.

Beetleback shield gives +1500 hp.

Aias shield gives x2 Block Rate and 80 block.

You’ll need critical gems and gear to get some critical chance. Zalciai will be doing some of the work.


In the end you’ll have something like this:

Int??? Sorry, I’m genuinely curious.

I thought Energy Blast does flat damage & increases 1% per attribute? Don’t rmb it scaling with INT; SPR may help it a little since it consumes 30SP/s but usually better off going to other stats.

DO NOT LVL TU TO 15! There is no reason why you would ever want to rely on such a high cd skill for damage. Sure, there are some high cd skills that are worth it. Like ones that will actually one-shot things like meteor or fire pillar. TU can already one-shot things at lv 1. 1 is enough. Smite will actually be better. Even with no str, if you have a mace, the base damage, skill damage, plus p.atk you gain from leveling up will still make the skill worth using on demons and mutants. They are fairly common mob races to see. Not to mention conviction debuff multiplies smite damage by 3.

The difference between smite 15 and tu 15 is roughly 800 skill damage. This is roughly 400 points in int to get 800 matk due to bonus points and rank bonus. That’s more stat points than you’ll get by lvl 280. TU will never be stronger than smite right now. Even more so since its single hit and smite can potentially triple hit plus 1 more hit from the attribute. Lv1 TU can kill undead/mutants just fine. Don’t turn down smite.

This is what I’m going with. Get at least 1 of every skill and master barrier. I prefer resist elements over restoration since the important part of resto is the sp recovery attribute. You can move whatever points into resto if that’s what you prefer

TU are good for mobs clearing in my experience, even with low INT (38) and SPR (11) i can kill 3-7 enemy with lvl 5 TU most of the time. most of enemy are mutant or devil so its quite good for mob clearing. just sharing im in lvl 132 now. And all the dungeon mostly of the enemy are mutant or demon

But enemy magic damage are so hurt (130DG and main chamber), so my question are resist elements nulify damage good in early lvl ?

and i read that conversion can converse multiple enemy and elite monster can be converse too. is that real ? anybody have try this ?

I’m sorry, but there is no reason you would want level 3 conversion. The number of mobs you can convert scales with the skill level. level 2 is the minimum that should be put into turn undead, the extra number of targets helps when there is a large group. Your last 2 points can go into restoration or turn undead.

It’s a good skill and has a decent aoe range since it was patched. People often will underestimate it because of how long the cd was in cbt. I never tested turn undead before I read about it in the patch notes, because I only heard bad things. That cool down is manageable at least now. For a skill that can one-shot mobs, it’s worth having. Lots of Paladin’s will agree.


@SoulLifter @Randy I was told by an experienced player that INT works with Monk. I would absolutely need to confirm and test this myself to make sure.

Only worth if you intend to max the skill, it’s not 100% uptime so leveling it will increase the duration. It’s especially good at high level. But there really is no reason not to max it is there?

Yassssss, you do that! :grinning: The problem is, what’s the role of int here?

@Randy Energy Blast use to scale with INT, I actually haven’t found any info on it stating that’s true or not. All anyone ever talks about on the Forum is that EB is physical (yes I know it’s physical). But if it’s true that INT does add into the Skill calculation, that makes it viable no? I’m sorry that I am just theorycrafting here. But physical Monk doesn’t interest me at all. :wink:

Gotta ask those monk guys in Monk thread since we’re talking about Paladin anyway.

This was in response to someone asking if Paladin c3 was viable AFTER Krivis c2. And I was saying that Monk would be better. xD That’s all this was about!

Without c3 Priest and c2 Cleric, going for Paladin is not a good option.

Yes I was the one that asked that. I’m still considering it. Even if I’ll regret it later on I think Imma try the Krivis c2 > Paladin build and be the odd paladin out there just for the sake of trying.

I’ve heard that it does work to some extension and I’ve seen some videos so I might as well try to see if it works. I’ll be posting here after I get high enough level to test the build.

If you’re going Krivis Paladin, I will timidly suggest that you go Krivis 3 > Paladin 3, and Max out both Aukuras and restoration.

I’ll do that! I’ll go from Krivis 2 to Paladin then back to Krivis for rank 7.

Thanks for the input though!