Invest 30 stat points on CON. That should make it fine not taking any HP boost items/gears. 3:1 is my build at the moment is the evasion and decent crit rate from it is great. Although I still have a plan to reset to pure STR eventually.
Incoming math. This comparison is considering your base damage is at average 1200 patk.
Lv1 Split Arrow
100%+332
332/1200 = 27.6% improvement on both the main hit and bounced hits.
Lv5 Split Arrow
100%+631
631/1200 = 52.6%
But let’s say you want to think ahead using end-game stats, 1800 base patk,
Lv1 Split Arrow
100%+332
332/1800 = 18.4%
Lv5 Split Arrow
100%+631
631/1800 = 35%
As you can see, it’s still quite the drastic improvement. You can farm fast anyways so spending silvers on Lv10 CSP won’t be a problem.
It’s really common for most players to be misled by some game mechanic. If I say that Spiral Arrow also has 100% modifier each yet it has some weaker hits. Does that mean the skill is actually weak and the modifier is a lie? The answer is no.
IMC sometimes puts some unnecessary damage randomizer on skills just so it improves game aesthetics. This especially can be seen on Seism and Spiral Arrow, of course there are other skills too.
To check how these modifiers actually work is you test your damage output using a weapon with the smallest damage variance + using a -max attack gem on it to make the damage output more stable.
After that, you can now finally test the damage of a skill. It’s better to do this w/o any crit rate or any additive damage blabla etc.
So for example, I tested Twin Arrows. Let’s say it did a total damage of 200.
I then equipped a head costume with +40 patk and did another damage test. It became a total of 280 damage.
So as you can see, I did not test how the damage fluctuates but instead checked the total damage dealt and how it improved. Having an 80 damage increase with just an additional 40 patk means the modifier is 200%. 40*2 = 80.
IMO FLoki giving away statements like “The second hit from it do less damage than the first one…” makes you look naive as you would only look at the cover then judge. I’m not trying to offend you again, I’m just being frank here.

