[quote=âMelon, post:51, topic:301219, full:trueâ]
Except iCBT2,even with the gamebreaking exploits in it, didnât have nearly the same amount of unhappy players as we do now.And none of the current restrictions were present then [except the buyback feature was disabled by then,I think? I donât remember].[/quote]
If we have the same environment as we do on iCBT, current situations will be more harsh and unbearable. I wont be surprise if we see items with off the chart prices. Unbearable situation comes from too much freedom. Thats why IRL we have so many rules and laws that need to be followed, cause people are abusive in nature.
[quote]Also,I donât think either IMC or the players want bots running around unattended.But all of this effort to try and automate a system is losing them both players and credibility as a company,when they could [as Iâve said from day 1] be more active in-game and deal with bots more effectively.They called that idea primitive and shooâd it away.But look where we are now.
Iâd bet you anything weâd have less bots now if they just used that method from the start,at least until they were done developing this system of theirs.[/quote]
Itâs nice to have GM running around doing what GM suppose to do. We dont know if they do that or not but probably they dont have enough man power to make that idea with significant result. Lets say we do that with their current pool of people and focus only on that, what about other problems? Like bugs and porting the patches. The idea is maybe good if you have lots of people but seeing IMC needed even translators indicates that they do lack of employee.
Melon: But IMC have tons of money now from early access they can afford at least 5 GMs for every klaipeda on every servers to lessen the gold seller.
Botters can change the place anywhere they want. It could be in east siauliai woods where monster dont respawn or anywhere else. Meaning they will require more GMs than the current 30 gms stationed on every klaipeda. Thats for gold sellers alone, we have lots of maps and channels to explore on. 100+ GMs for your suggestion is maybe too much IMC can give.
[quote=âFatePGN, post:52, topic:301219, full:trueâ]
Saying something, and doing something is 2 different things. Itâs clear as day that as things are going now, no RMTâer is afraid, there is no fear in RMTing. Plenty of people do it, people have been caught redhanded, posted on the forums, and still are not banned. The restrictions do nothing, and with the restrictions in place, they donât cause fear of banning. Being unable to trade silver doesnât cause fear of RMTing, itâs there to straight up eradicate it altogether, like everything else they are doing.[/quote]
We will see that in the upcoming patch, you can try to RMT if you think it will failed. It would be a good test i think.
[quote]
Thatâs an assumption, all they said in the patch is:
"After an item is reported five times, it will no longer be able to be purchased or retrieved unless processed by a GM.
- Items âon holdâ will be evaluated and processed by a GM."
The part where it says five was even removed after all the backlash. Perhaps they will change it? Time will tell. Regardless this is only one bad restriction on top of other restrictions already in place.[/quote]
âWe will make another announcement about this new function with more details soon.â
Read it again.
[quote]
And yet nearly every other MMO out there that doesnât do this, is fine.[/quote]
No they dont, they suffer from botters too. EA: blizzard diablo.