A fact about the early access thing is that it was well needed. Infact their original plan for 3months would have had been a lot better for the longevity of the game.
A fact it would have been even better to postpone the release of early access.
A fact IMC had to restrict new accounts later on quite soon after early access cause there were still too many problems they weren’t able to fix.
A fact the community wanted to play so badly it really transpired badly for the image of the game and their company.
A fact huge part of the community agreed to the early access with the better terms suggested. While some knew the original plan would have been better but at the time even personally I didn’t see that.
A fact there was a very cheap option for early access after the complaints with the others providing HUGE value that was definitely worth it for any buyer. (Considering you actually played the game. Obviously anything you spend on any game isn’t of value if you don’t play it.)
I think it’s very ignorant to claim that it was trickery. Sure it’s obvious they catered for that option but only cause they really needed an early access time. It was clear from the community that they won’t accept three months and one week on the other hand would have been a very short time so they only did what was best for them at the time.
I’m not gonna say that IMC doesn’t deserve blame for this cause they obviously do. IMC should have been firm and should have postponed the release a lot more and they should have been more vocal and open about the situation to gain more understanding.
But this is in the past and what happened, happened. I’d still prefer people taking into consideration other factors of the matter than the obvious catering of specific poll option when discussing this topic.
I also find it very counterproductive to use this particular topic against IMC as it’s one of those rare moments where they actually went against their original decision and listened to the playerbase.