Because they didn’t know it was wrong.
Only after players reported the issue that they fixed the announcement.
Yeah, it’s lacking the Talt information.
But the update fixes the part about the confusion 50% and 100%. Making it so there’s no wrong information there anymore, only missing (which is still bad but not false/wrong).
Said several times, communication issue between themselves, core of them problem. Which could lead to the lie I was talking about because they needed more than just edit to fix it.
Most stupid event ever. But… Why should I expect from a company that treat western costumers as pieces of trash? Well. I guess there’s no use about complaining about it.
Good luck for everyone.
Stop embarrassing yourself IMCRabbit.
We’re still clinging to that little hope, sadly.
I gave up on the event myself, let the people need it use it I guess, but I don’t really see it as something worth participating.
It’s probably an event bug the, related to this:
That could be reported in the same way you reported the mismatching between 50% and 100% bonuses.
Lie:
Error:
I’m not defending IMC. I’m just complaining about overestimation of issues/trolling/etc.
It’s not because I agree with you in something that I must agree with your ways.
Uhh…the lie I was talking about wasn’t the announcement.
More like, they lied that they made the mistake on 100% and apologized instead so that they could get away without having to do anymore fixes.
Now link us the definition of deny.
They didn’t. The event seems to be designed for 50% exp. That’s what I think.
Here’s why:
Only the copy-pasted parts from last week are saying double or 100%. The new parts of the announcement says simply “Bonus EXP”.
Look, previous week:
This week:
It’s pretty clear that the problem is in the announcement that was copy-pasted from previous week and that’s the event was designed to be what it is now.
Stop embarrasing yourself.
It still doesn’t change the fact that it’s the header.
Again, changing a few texts doesn’t actually change the whole design.
You re-used a double exp weekend event page, added in a text because you’d like to try using an NPC instead.
Again, this could be seen as a lie more than enough because of the updated event at a later point AND the fact that they probably didn’t put the talt requirement because they didn’t know. Another miscommunication, which could also be said for 50% instead of 100%.
The person who copied the 100% event post could be very well aware that it’s double EXP. The event manager or dev might only want 50%, or 100% but misplaced as 50%. which lead to this disaster.
If only, maybe it would be worth it then. But since cost keeps increasing, it doesn’t seem to be something you want to use on multiple characters.
Also, nice dialogue/title for the Kupole npc imc 
But again, it’s only 50% exp, I’m not even mad.
Let me be direct now here.
Sure, I agree with you. Since the start actually, not sure if you noticed read the “Agreed.” on my second reply to you.
But miscommunication isn’t a lie. And this is why I keep answering. You’re overestimating an issue and actually contradicting yourself.
It all depends on the order. You have your opinion about 100% being the intended one.
I have my opinion about the 50% being the intended one.
And I have already said why I think that and I’ll repeat it.
Only the copy-pasted parts from last week are saying double or 100%. The new parts of the announcement says simply “Bonus EXP”.
They even actually fixed the announcement about it and apologized about.
This makes me think the value that was put on code is correct. After all, typing 50 is very different from typing 100. It isn’t like a mistake of a missing 0 or extra 0. They most likely intentionally typed 50 when coding the event.
Btw, if you look closely. It actually shows some text. Seems we didn’t get the translation file update we were supposed to >_<
The miscommunication itself wasn’t the lie.
It’s the lie about them making the mistake, apologized and saying that it was intended.
What’s that mistake I was talking about? It’s supposed to be 100% and not 50, but was placed as 50 instead.
Yes I’ve read that part. Point is, you believe in 50, I believe in 100.
Design flaw or not:
1 - Headline.
2 - Picture.
3 - Important Message saying double.
Nothing else said 50%. Bonus EXP is Bonus EXP, not 50%, a different text could mean anything, no point can be taken here, only the fact that they used bonus exp instead of 100.
Reused or not, double was announced for quite a while now. They didn’t know? Apologized? Okay, gotta do it right to fix the problem, not cover it up with this edited announcement (which you believe to be true…, I don’t)
Yeah, and about that we can either agree to disagree.
Or we continue discussing and fall here:
A) The event is designed to have 50% bonus exp.
B) The event is designed to have 100% bonus exp.
No way to prove either of them and seems we can’t agree to disagree. Nor agree for it to be unknown or impossible to know.
It’s called argument from ignorance:
We can simply stop trying to judge the situation since we lack data but you, for some reason, seems to want to convince everyone of your point regardless of anything else.
Yes, not convinced? Sure, go ahead.
I’m simply saying that’s what I believe it to be. Did I force anyone to believe me? You choose what you want to believe.
My stand is still here, there’s still this false advertisement/announcement going on.
And same, I’m just expressing my opinion:
Only the copy-pasted parts from last week are saying double or 100%. The new parts of the announcement says simply “Bonus EXP”.
And saying why I think about it.
Previous week:
Current week:
For me it’s pretty clear that the problem is in the announcement that was copy-pasted from previous week and that’s the event was designed to be what it is now, 50%.
???
Okay…?
You’re just repeating what you’ve said.
I know, I’m just repeating what I said just like you repeat what you said.
You think it’s 100%.
I think it’s 50%.
My stand is still here, there’s an apologize and update on the announcement, thus no more error or false advertising when it comes to 50% vs 100% since they’ve already given their position about it.
We can keep repeating ourselves all the day. Is it worth it though?
