I’m indifferent… I just want to pay IMC some money for their game. Get my key and then take a long break from this forum. All the nice people went into hiding or were drowned out during this poop storm.
1 Like
It will delay the launch. It’s obvious
1 Like
I have voted A, 7 days.
Less game time advantage for paying players, same amount of TP that they wanted. MOST players happy.
If paying players complain about the duration of the early access, the main reason they are paying is to get an advantage, not to support you.
However, my suggestion would be the following:
Start a kickstarter or anything similar, make different goals that will be provide a server-wide buffs depending on the goals reached.
In addition, give players that actually donated money’s worth TP and additional premium goodies.
There is absolutely no need to create huge gaps with early access, even a month.
But what happens will happen. That’s all.
2 Likes
an illusion of choice eh . lol its so obvious you guys wants the game out in 1 month with the benefits the other options don’t have. Might as well just announce it as 1 month together with added benefits. xD
5 Likes
We as a whole seriously need to know if the start date for all of these options will bne the 22nd of march… or a different date entirely. Me ive been following ToS even before closed betas, and i for one want my vote to go to what is the closest to playing. I was fully willing to pay 50 to play the 22nd of march. So if the dates change, my vote would change and be more to the truth i want to vote for.
5 Likes
Hallelujah. I love you. Take my money and have my babies.
It seems like a majority of players voted for option B. Question is when does this vote end and a final decision is made?
Second, when will it be avaliable on Steam for purchase and will the launch date (22 March) be delayed because of it?
2 Likes
Please stagger the release for the 1 month option as well. 1-2 days between packages would be okay. It’s going to be a terrible launch day if everyone gets on the same time.
That’s what a lot want to know we dont really care the entry formula
Well, I am glad IMC responded quickly. Casting my vote! 
First option seems like it’d be good for people who are impatient (I admit I could be one, haha), but it might not give IMC the time necessary to work out unforeseen problems.
Second option seems reasonable, we just wait a bit longer.
B Seems to be the best option.
But my biggest question is… It still starts at march 22 right…? not 1 month before the June f2p access :v
5 Likes
Now you can take our money, all of them. Further more, you take our money in the correct way. And some explanation when there is a big decision like this will always help. Remember, good communication can avoid unwanted problems. Love always, RO and TOS. BTW I’d go for B $50, however 10 bucks seem a bit cheap if you REALLY want to limit the players. Oh well, we can do with it.
PS. Delaying the early release day is ok for me. I’ve been waiting for 5 years, another month or so isn’t going to kill me. (But it does hurt.)
3 Likes
i play TOs ser.korea but not no Ok , We are ,My Guild wait Test system stream server
The private game server system also has the problem of Korea.
1. bug in pvp because disparity of ping make the team. I can see. Played together,
2. ping - impact on the ability to slow down.
3. lag - sometimes because there are too many players made some chanal can not be teleported to. LOCATION others
4.Exp can not be obtained from PvE alone in the back (not alone, because you might get it to quit).
"“But I want everybody to see IMC will bring credibility back , I think so.”
6 Likes
B for the win! I will pay for that one
Nice bait for 1 month thb… that stat/skill reset sure takes your mind away.
Looks like IMC needs more time for the actual release.
O__o This poll is a joke.
1week staggered and 3 months staggered have no difference in price but a reduction in EA time and slightly lower TP. Meanwhile, the 1month access has amazing bonuses for $50 pack.
There’s no question which one I’m voting for and purchasing but it’s pretty obvious which “opinion” they want us to pick.
Furthermore, dropping EA from 3months to 7 days is HUGE. How do they feel justified to maintain that $50 price tag, especially since their who reason for the founders pack is to test server loads etc. If they came out and said “Guy’s we don’t have enough cash to launch this game, we really need your help!” I’d understand.
Well, I just don’t like feeling manipulated into thinking our opinions mattered when we were just tricked into picking what they want. They know option 2 is gonna win and the fact they had to do it this way hints they lack confidence in their game. I know they’ll get my $50 but I hope it doesn’t turn into another Neverwinter online.
3 Likes
Just going to leave this here.
2 Likes
So are we essentially also delaying access by voting?
Gonna vote B to find a middle ground between having a founder period and weeaboo’s having their free game.
1 Like
2 wins
Release now!!!
1 Like