You don’t make any sense.
I gave an example of what they did on euRO.
euRO had 6k player on 2 server, even if you take in consideration the number after the merge, you get 4k ppl on it, and thats 2 to 4 times the number of player on each server of itos (if you split 13k for all the server we have, you get 1 to 2k per server ) , that means that we have less player for gm ratio here (would have).
The channel thing is just a big nosense? What does it matter anyway?
Even if there are 20 channel, doesnt mean you need 20 gm, one for every channel.
You need 1 gm (ofc you need more for the whole server) , he gets a call, goes to see and do his thing, he gets a call on 2 channel? He goes to those 2 channel, saying that you need 2 gm for 2 channel is just pointless.
You dont even have to pay them (duh, i wrote it btw), you could get 20 ppl per server to “work” as a gm (in their spare time, like they did ob euRO) for free or for a small ammount of tps.
Im sure of it, im sure there are even more than 20 ppl willing to do it for small ammount of tps.
Even if they could solves 10% of all report, it would be a HUGE improvement and it would actually show the community that they can talk to someone to fix a problem (botting, gold seller) asap, instead of waiting 1,2,3 weeks.
There isnt a easy way out of the bot problem, THERE ARE tools and way to contain it.
Banning players after they receive x ammount of report its not one of them.
Saing that they can’t ban bots because they are too few and gets too many report, its not one of them.