Not sure if this is intended and will stay like this or not but currently the Bokor Master NPC is called Bokor Mama in the English Translation Project. 
ETC_20150317_006980 Bokor Mama
I started reworking the class pages (which was on my todo list for a long time already). Currently I uploaded 2 new version (Archer and Wizard) and would like to get some feedback before I continue.
The first change is that I added the class icon the the left and moved the gif to the right side.
The main change is the skill list. Before the skills were displayed as tables just like in the Skill Database but it never really felt right for the class page. I think most people there want to get an overview and the tables arenāt the best way for it. I moved some less important information to the tooltip so that everythign is slimmer and less space is used for each skill.
Do you like the new way the skills are displayed or do you prefer the old one?
Is there some information that I should add to the skill view again?
Should I use the same style for the Attribute List below that still uses tables?
I like the way it looks now compared to before. But the one thing I would add to the skill list is at what circle of that class you have to be in order to start learning that skill.
Edit: Iām blind. I didnāt see that it already said what circle you can get it at. Ignore this. Lol.
Mmmā¦ Iām sorry to say I donāt quite like the change, but I may be representative of what a veteran visitor wants, and not really seeing the briefness youāre trying to give newer players as a class overview.
Well, Iāll explain why I specifically donāt like it before I try to be more general on how much Iād compensate for changes:
-
Tables were much easier to compare skills of the same class, rather than having to hover over for the tooltips. I suppose, the few main things I need to look at to understand a class is: the description (+ damage type), the CD, the stance (for swordsmen or archers) and the video is optional for me. I am usually able to sort the repertoire of skills into its respective categories of the: Long CD AoE type, short CD spammable skill, permanent buffs, buffs for bossing, etc.
-
There is currently little motivation to actually click on the skills for more information, given the unavailability of the exact values of what adding skill points do. By making the class pages more concise, it will force me to open tabs of every skill JUST for tables, and not much useful extra info. Sometimes I open multiple classes for theorycrafting sessions, and that would be a catastrophe.
-
As weāre feeding new info from the KR client to the wiki, skills are subject to change, and it will be very difficult to ever detect any of that. I dread the day that Iād have to hover over skill icons cause they hurt my brain right now.
-
Tlādr, tooltips scare me. I cannot read them. Spare the attributes section, nyuuuuuuuuā¦ A cool icon for Slash/Stab/Hit would be cool, but I guess there isnāt one to pull from ingameā¦
On second thought, Iām a bit too tired to get into the mindset of what a newer player might want, myuuā¦ Sheepyā¦ Also I am kinda conscious that I just made a huge agglomerated point, rather than several different points like the bulletpoint format denotesā¦
Just do what your heart feels is right, for
I pray that the outcomes are utilitarian. I trust your judgment.
@Flash I prefer the old way because we have more information available for each skill at the class page. But this is my opinion. 
Ok so I think the main problem with the new design is that too much data was hidden in tooltips whihc made them more complicated to access?
I uploaded new version of the Archer and Wizard page. Max Level, CD, SP and Required Stance are now displayed between the name and the description. Do you think this is a way in the right direction to make it useable for both new players and veterans or do you still think it would be better to move back to tables?
1 Like
Ok, so I decided to use tables again. With this amount of information not using a table looks pretty messy. And moving 50% of the skill info to the tooltip really is bad for comparing skills. However I cleaned up the tables a little bit (removed class info and merged Type & Element, swapped Req stance and Description). The new tables can be seen on the Wizard and Archer page.
So what do you think about this version? If this one is ok Iām probably not going to change the Attribute tables at all.
2 Likes
Iām not very meticulous on the design and layout. but I big two thumbs up swell thumbss to Flash and Gardosen ; u ;
Tosbase is always the first site I visit for any information I need regarding class skills and builds. Itās been really helpful!
I havenāt really experienced any difficulty looking up information I needed, and Iām not even a veteran user of this website ^-^
Just wanted to send a little appreciation ; u ; / 
1 Like
Question: Whatās the strange yellow O on some of the skills on skill sim?
Also, suggestion: Do you think you can add class-attribute? for example the one that enables using 2H Sword on Highlander or Cataphract allowing you to mount companion.
Itās āOverheatā which means that a skill can be used more than once before the cooldown triggers. We will replace the āOā witch the number of charges once we added them to the Skill Sim.
Class attributes like using 2H swords can already be seen on the class pages: http://www.tosbase.com/game/classes/Highlander/
If you are talking about adding it to the Skill Simulator. I guess that should be possible even though Iām not 100% sure if it belongs there but I guess it wonāt hurt.
I meant for skill sim, yes.
It definitely matters since some of these attribute are class-defining (like Highlanderās +50% crit for 2H wielding, or Pyro/Cryoās extra fire/ice damage for using specific weapon)
3newHighlanderskillsIwillbecheckingToSBaseclosely >=3
The skills have been added to the Skill DB and the Skill Simulator.
3 Likes
D:
THEIR BASE ATTACK ALL SUCK. Better be multi-hit skillsā¦ Though I doubt it cause I can see your Omega Overheat signs on the skills. Apparently more charges makes up for having decent base attack to IMC, noitdoesnātreally.
All 3 slash skillsā¦ Hmm hmmā¦
Sky Liner seems like another launcher skill, so that Highlanders actually match more with their description as abusing collision-like skills other than Cartarstroke and Wagon Wheel, I get it, I get it.
Cross Cut is a bleed activator, for which Sky Liner is supposed to do extra damages, okay, okay. I donāt care about bonus damage for such terribly weak skills in the first place, but maybe attributes will change my mind on everything. Never played with Pommel Beat or Double Slash to really see bonus damages in action, so I am lacking in experience.
Vertical Slash is apparently another armour break skill. Itās Google translated translation might suggest that itās another Punish skill for knocked down enemies, AKA no work on bosses, sorry excuse for a C3 skill. But I need videos to make sure I am right. Anyway, Skull Swing was the reason to go to Highlanders in the first place, so an extra one seems dokes.
All-in-all, they are trying to buff Highlanders in the same way they buffed Rodeleros. I never found much merit in tons of spammable skills on a build, as youād just drain your MP out. You need efficiency in damage-per-mana, yus. (Iām looking at you, Stylish gameplay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6ZxyBIQ0Mo)ā¦ As much as I wanted some skills to contest the standard Highlander point allocation for Cartarstroke, Moulinet and Skull Swing, I donāt knowā¦ Iām happy but disappointed.
Anyway thatās my stupid thought trail about these skills, which donāt belong here o xo; Thanks a lot Flash for everything.
EDIT: I donāt really think Vertical Slash is another Punish anymore. Anyway, Iāll have to see how it plays out by biding my time and waiting for someone to upload from KRā¦ Do I need charges on a debuff skill? Not really. Will Skull Swing and Vertical Slash stack? It better. Iāll put my faith in a Luring Slice of ToS, but Squires better not steal my job away with Arrestā¦
Also Highlanders can live with just using Cartarstroke for C1, and save points for the rest I guess. That is if anyone actually intends to go Highlander and not just cause they have to or want the passive 50% Crit Rate with 2H swordsā¦ So pretty much nobody. Maybe except that idiot who will make a C3 Swordsman, C2 Highlander build for bleed builds.
Another Circle 3 Rodelero skillā¦ Not sure if I should report these, myuuā¦ Seems like a bother.
Iām more curious about whether the KR CBT client has new music o no
I am noticing that there shouldāve been that Cloaking Attribute added, which isnāt in the database yet. Is it a manual process that you have to go through to update the wiki? Mmmā¦
Also Plague Doctor is absolutely a Cleric classā¦ I ought to check Reddit more often, cause important things do turn upā¦ Well, thereās no hurry I guess, no competition, nyahahaā¦ Bye.
It helps me noticing new skills faster when Iām working on other stuff instead of checking patches
I added 2 Rodelero skills (only 2 of them are part of the Skill Tree yet so I assume the 3rd one might get added later)
I also updated the Attributes of Highlander, Scout and Rodelero (itās a little tricky for attributes) but didnāt notice any of them being related to the new skills. Iām not sure if this is correct or some error. Maybe someone can confirm if the new skills already have attributes that are missing on TOSBase?
1 Like
High Kickās image really hurts the onion feels. 
Anyways, Iām starting to wonder how those skills actually work in game instead of just guessing and theory crafting 
Glad to help then >w<;;
Attributes have always been wonky thoughā¦ If balance and skills were half-baked when ToS started out, then Attributes would be a frog. Frogs are delicious, but only if you bifurcate it and eviscerate the toxin-filled excess, like preparing fugu. Also a conscientious person thinks about whether to take a life of a frog today for their meal or not, making things very arbitrarily done.
In other words, IMCgames are trying to handle balance issues to make each class viable standalone, which is even more important with the new system so people donāt gravitate to ācoreā jobs. So far, they thought about new skills, and havenāt give much of a thought to using Attributes or just significant buffs to old skillsā¦ All of these later circle jobs with imbalanced number of Attributes drives me crazy, and makes no symmetrical sense. Needs first-hand confirmation from KR players to know if theyāre missing or not, bleh.
Tl;dr:
IMCgames thinks the solution is: More skills > Effective (or actually having) Attributes.
Problems: 45 skill points for 3 additional skills which donāt seem all that much better, but weāll seeā¦
EDIT: Should be noted though, Highlanders and Rodeleros are the only two classes in the Warrior class tree which have no self-buffs, or utility skills. Yes, even Cataphracts have Trot. They are more like CC/debuff classes, and I should probably judge what extra utility these skills bring, rather than pure damage.
Based on the latest patch notes it seems that equipment in the PVP Battle Leage will be the same for every character. We updated our PVP page with datamined information that still needs to be confirmed.
We also added some new skills / updated the Skill Simulator based on this patch information.
More about the patch: http://www.tosbase.com/news/202/kCBT3-Patch-Notes-September-15th/
3 Likes
Thx for sharing!
Do you know if we get the bonus from plate mastery, since all armory is plate?
And what about default accessories? I wanna know how much MDEF people have, lol.