So I have a couple of builds that im thinking off.
A1- QS3 - FL2 - M1/C1
A1- QS3 - FL3
A1- QS3 - Scout1 - SR1 - M1/SR2
A1 - QS3- Wug2 - M1
So… how inferior are these builds compared to the usual build we see like. A2-R2-FL3 / A2-QS3-Falc1-M1.
So I have a couple of builds that im thinking off.
A1- QS3 - FL2 - M1/C1
A1- QS3 - FL3
A1- QS3 - Scout1 - SR1 - M1/SR2
A1 - QS3- Wug2 - M1
So… how inferior are these builds compared to the usual build we see like. A2-R2-FL3 / A2-QS3-Falc1-M1.
bump
/20charactersthoyeah
QS - Fletcher doesn’t make sense because they’re both sustained damage. You’d be like “Do I spam my 0-5cd skills or do keep auto attacking?”
QS - Wug is pretty good but the problem with Wugushi is when there’s another Wugushi around. Your poisons would overwrite each other.
If you don’t feel like having a rank in Falconer, you can also go A2 QS3 Scout1 M1/C1 for a PVE-PVP balance.
As what @tampon has said, QS and Fletcher are both sustained DPS so you’ll only be able to take advantage of either classes one at a time and not at the same time.
Another option would be A2 QS3 SR2.
Note:
Just a note sr is being changed in ktos with running shot not working with retreat shot anymore. Unsure when or if it would come to itos but just a headsup
Oh, didn’t know. Thanks for the heads up. Editing my reply to quote yours.
Thank you for all the replies. so if i really want fletcher. qs is def out of the picture. what are my other alternatives besides ranger then?