Tree of Savior Forum

PSA: TOS is F2P. So we are ALL F2Players

General Discussion
#1

Getting tired of the daily arguments in world chat about F2P, and seeing crybaby, wannabe elitists here actually complaining about closing this or that to F2Players. Buying early access/founder packs does not make you anything more than a person willing to spend their (or their parents’) money on a very buggy game. You are no different than any other person who chose to join after the game’s early access ended and therefore, not entitled to special treatment or additional perks.

There is no subscription service because this game is—wait for ittttt—FREE 2 PLAY.

Let me say: I have no issue with any founders or early access, but I do have an issue with elitists. I do have an issue when people think they can decide who can enjoy this-or-that service.

11 Likes
#2

“PSA: TOS is F2P. So we are ALL F2Players”

Im sorry but it really does not work that way.

7 Likes
#3

Your photo matches to this post.

1 Like
#4

May I ask what you are referring too? What is this and that? Tit for tat?

#5

It really does, I’m afraid. The game is free, and we’re not paying to play it. Now, we can put money into it but the game itself is still F2P.

#6

I paid for this game I’m supreme :stuck_out_tongue: More Talts! More Talts!

3 Likes
#7

The game is f2p, but not everyone is “f2player”. IMC money doesn’t come from trees. I guess that’s his point.

#8

Yes the game itself is F2P but as soon as a player pays, they are now a paying player.

1 Like
#9

Sure! Well, I’m mostly referring to discussions I’ve seen in game for the most part, but the thread below this one is “Petiton: do not make telsiai open to f2p (sic)”.

1 Like
#10

No, dear. The game itself is F2P, there is no subscription service and anyone who wants to play may do so for free. This game is F2P. We are not paying to play.

1 Like
#11

There are 2 servers. Why not keep one free to play and the other one p2p or b2p? Ever thought about that? No flaming, just a suggestion.

#12

Paying players on these games are defined by paying to play. They are defined by people who support the game financially so thats not a argument that matters.

Also Token benefits disagree with you.

1 Like
#13

Please don’t use make up terms like “F2Players”. If IMC wanted otherwise, then they would’ve chose B2P or P2P, which will probably be F2P a few months later anyway.
It’s a F2P game, get over it.

#14

I don’t honestly mind anything like that. Hell, if IMC steps it up and fixes some of the game’s issues I’d even buy to play if there was an option. And if there was a server for B2Pers then so be it, if you have the money to transfer there. But as of now the entire game is accessible to all, and I don’t think it’s fair that some think they’re entitled to more. Literally, you just paid for early access.

It’s to the point where I’ve seen people bitching that F2Pers are the ones ruining the game when we’re…all F2P, lol.

edit: By B2P you do mean subber, right?

#15

Special Item

TOS Token : When activated increase your chance of getting Arde Dagger by 90%.

Now that is special treatment!

60 dun runs all talts!! come on!! :cry:

#16

Just buy one. The price has been dropping hard.

#17

I didn’t create that term, check this post title before telling me to get over stuff i don’t care about.

#18

You are just so wrong…

There are a lot of distribution models a game may choose to be distributed… this one choosed F2P.
If you are buying TP, nice, you are supporting the game but that doesnt change how it works.

I’m here since the closed betas and i always asked for B2P or P2P, unfortunatelly they choose F2P, so, everyone is F2P, every fuc**** one.

Simple as that.

2 Likes
#19

You’re post is most logical one so far other then the original post.

They could however it wouldn’t solve everything people would hope. They would still have same amount of bots they had when exclusive access was a thing. The lag depends on if the server is running on it’s own or with another server linked with it.

There is the issue as if you limit a server to being paying for access then you would cause the other server to carry all the other players which doesn’t have that access limiting the areas they have to go to causing the load of players on the other servers.

It would need to be open for anyone to purchases access to else people wouldn’t be able to join with there friends. If locked away to only players who already bought over time it would become slightly dead if players ever left the game.

I’m not against the idea of a server being set for exclusive access however I would have a new server set for that and give people free transfers over to such server and to keep it fair for everyone they should have one for each server area. I would grandfather anyone in who have bought the older dlc packs.

2 Likes
#20

I wouldn’t care about free players if the server was ready. But the queue to play sucks. :confused: I’m not blaming the players, but IMC.