Try another browser or ensure you have flash plugin installed and enabled. Google Chrome should work out of the box without any configuration needed.
2 Likes
I’ve tried 3 differents browsers (ie, chrome and Mozilla)
Solution in GoogleChrome:
Refresh
2 Likes
Ping from Bahia
2 Likes
Testing from João Pessoa (city)/Paraíba (state)/Brazil (country)
http://i.imgur.com/wol5EyL.png,
http://i.imgur.com/Q3Xghg5.png
http://i.imgur.com/47BA755.png
2 Likes
Tested at all the available recommended servers:
[SA] Silute. Testing from Minas Gerais, Brazil. ISP: Brasconnect Informática.
Dallas 01
Dallas 05
Dallas 06
Dallas 07
Dallas 09
São Paulo
Got better response from São Paulo server and Dallas 05/07
2 Likes
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ISP: Fibertel // Cablevision S.A.
I don’t know why you’d ever consider to host a SA server in Dallas, or anywhere outside SA itself. It’s clearly worse ping due to geographical distance, for starters.
2 Likes
Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.
Net Virtua.
Dallas 01
Dallas 05
Dallas 06
Dallas 07
Dallas 09
São Paulo
2 Likes
Here’s my results from Brasília - Distrito Federal, Brazil. Some of the Dallas ones were not available for testing, so I did the ones I could.
2 Likes
From São Paulo - Brasil
ISP: Vivo
dallas 1
dallas 5
dallas 6
dallas 7
dallas 9
SP/BR
idk why São Paulo is that bad :l
2 Likes
I think São Paulo is a good choice, or maybe Paraná to give Argentina and Chile somewhat better latencies, though it really wouldn’t change much. In the end just having a server located in South America would really benefit all South American players, they just need to make sure the server is stable enough to handle the demands of the game.
4 Likes
Testing from Bahia - Brazil.
ISP: NET Virtua
Dallas 01
Dallas 05
Dallas 06
Dallas 07
Dallas 09
Sao Paulo
1 Like
Testing from Brazil / Brasília 
I am from Rondônia/North Region, Brazil
Dallas 1 (273 ms)
Dallas 5 (274 ms)
Dallas 6 (257 ms)
Dallas 7 (250 ms)
Dallas 9 (257 ms)
São Paulo (120 ms)
Dallas 2, 10 and 12 are not avaliable here.
