I have the same Rank build on my Cannoneer, Appraiser & Hunter C3 are really cool/useful.
But man, the equipment sure is bad, even my level 280 Cannoneer deals more damage xD
Do agree to an extend. Blind Faith cooldown and uptime makes it only usable when we want to burst dps something down. True to its name, it will be really blind faith to place so much faith and emphasis on such a skill.
The true power of zealot c2 lies not in blind faith but in Fanaticism. Itâs an increase in up to 55% (60% with divine might) damage over 15 secs with a really short cooldown of 30secs. Thatâs a 50% uptime buff skill which doesnât discriminate on which side (patk or matk) the player is more of.
Theoretically to maximise usage of zealot, the build will need to satisfy the following:
- Generate the maximum number of hits during the 10sec blind faith window.
- Ability to keep HP and SP topped up most of the time so that Blind Faith / Fanaticism effect will be maximised during activation
Physical zealot builds canât really maximise the use of blind faith as much as magic zealots can now, due to the sheer difference in number of hits magic zealots can dish out in those 10secs.
Not exactly, Monk can attack faster then any other Cleric: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=net20PzfObQ
Imagine that speed with Blind Faith? Double Punch already has a good damage alone and Zealot skills fit perfectly on him without needing Blind Faith.
Monks would have to build dex for speed, and SPR for more maximum SP pool. Blind faith doesnât make a lot of sense on a physical dps stat build. Blind faith is like a team combo skill with linker3 to share stats, and oracle & enchanter to increase SP.
Physical clerics:
Invulnerable should be 0 or 1 for emergency. Use gazing golem cards.
Teleport at least lvl 1 for the crit rate attribute buff.
Fanaticism + fanatic illusion combo.
Fanaticism boosts every skill.
Immolation reduces value of fanaticism, preferably shouldnât be used together.
Blind faith 0 or 1 to apply critical debuff with attribute.
1 Like
Yeah, that speed will be ideal for blind faith. Fanaticism will be better though since it takes the double punch damage and multiplies it instead of it being no. of hits based. Focus more on Fanaticism instead will be better since monk is able to give debuffs which in turn grants more damage bonuses to double punch and fanaticism.
In the video the monk does 50 hits in 5secs. A magic based cleric should be able to match that too with 2x zaibas lv15 and 2x heal bombing within that time frame too. It gets even more interesting as more multi-hits are added in like Druidâs carnivory, transformed Tala Wizardâs multi-hit aoe within that 10sec burst âdo your 99 hit comboâ.
Agree with what @greyhiem said, physical clerics placing lesser emphasis on blind faith will be better.
The interesting part about Zealot is, although 2 of its skills are termed as âphysicalâ, the 2 key buff spells (Fanaticism and Blind Faith, are neutral as they both trigger on both physical and magic skills. It is a rather hybrid dps class which is a good choice for both magic and physical dps clerics.
2 Likes
500 Dex is already very much fast and Full Dex is essential to a strong Monk. Donât need SPR, with good equips and a Arcane Energy scroll you can get more then 6k SP, with that little amout is already enough to surpass others build combos of Zealot. Of course there are some Magic classes that are great with Fanaticism and Blind Faith, but from my point of view I see that Monk can take advantage using all Zealot skills.
The Monk build would be like this: https://tos-ktest.neet.tv/skill-planner#41122999jj.1a213a5564.213a45546595.162f3141516a7a81.1128314a5565
is SPR better than INT? and how he gets 300SPR and 300DEX? 
Edit: Lifeline. but how about cards?
So, doesnât BF make zealot a better choice than taoist as natural progression for an offensive krivis? More so since zealot skills donât cost items. Would the extra [zaibas] bring taoist up to par with zealot?
There are also other issues SPR addresses that makes zealot a better progression choice for krivis: status resistance, SP pool and recovery vs the ridiculous increases in SP costs, INT is bad as a damage stat.
Yeah, Taoist c2 is really bad if compare the damage against Zealot c2 for Krivis. fanaticism + blind faith adds much more imo since they affect more skills than just Zaibas. In terms of utility wise Taoist only gain 1 spell which usage is kind of niche. Krivis doesnât need Taoist C2 to be effective.
Personally for my main cleric Iâm going towards the build Cleric2>Krivis2>Sadhu3>Taoist1>Zealot1. Iâll lose the extra zaibas from stormcalling (doesnât really matter to me), 25% damage from fanaticism and blind faith. But Iâll gain the power of stormcalling+zaibas + lv5 fanaticism. Stormcalling also boost damage from Immolation which is really great imo.
This is a good future proof build since when R10 rolls along I can either get zealot2 for really good Blind faith + creeping death charm or head for Taoist2.
For Krivis c3 Zealot2 builds, going druid2 will be nice imo. Druid2 has good aoe, transform having 100% uptime with Meletis + some monster transformations like tala wizard gives hamaya styled aoe which is a great addition to zealot dps too. Not to mention damage immunity gives free reign to spam skills in fanaticism mode.
How I wish Kabbalist is available at circle6 if not Kabbalist c2 is a really good add-on to the zealot2 build.
I guess Iâll settle for zealot1 for now. I just canât not have inquisitor: burn on my chaplain no matter what. I already have a boner for inquisitor: burn and blind faith.
Same sentiments.I so want Inqusitor1 Zealot2 too. Kugura dance + breaking wheel + blind faith will be lol, double the wheel hits.
Zealot is so good that every build can add and it will be instantly better even if it is only circle 1, sighz.
Donât even say it or I will start to dream already! This would be crazy, so many funny and strong combos! 
Talking about ânextâ rank classes, what is you guys guesses?
Here is my guess:
1 Like
Maybe. Would be nice. Some gifs from Inven.
11 Likes
3 Likes
It is depend on a character build.
From my testing you donât need an INT at all main source of damage came from your weapon magic attack
int increase your damage but it is not a must.
but you need some spr though enchanter skill use so much SP
Chrono 3 enchanter 2 build
all buff use 2-3k sp every 5 min (almost 50% of sp on 0 spr invest character)
if you donât mind about SP pot then you donât need spr too.
tbh enchanter c2 is fully freedom
you can build anything end with enchanter c2 depend on your preferable
status
int for more damage
dex for more attack speed
spr for more sp pool and scale with some skill (thuamatuge) or summon class
con for more hp and more block chance (but without con invest en2 is very tanky)
you can also mix it.
Ok, i donât know if iâm missing something, but i have a question.
The Kabbalistâs Rod attribute changes you basic attack to a âwizardâs basic attackâ, and iâm guessing that this basic attack is magical.
So⌠using the âNew and improvedâ Daino will simply do nothing? as is already using magic attack.
Then Daino and Kabba are mutually exclusive
Iâm asking that because someone said me that âDaino interacts with Transmit Pranaâs additional damageâ
Yep the Kabbalist wand/rod attribute is a magical attack.
Daino changes your basic attack to magic attack, but that includes other weapons too like maces and not limited only to rods. And yes Daino interacts with Transmit Prana.
If Daino, who makes your basic attacks magical interacts with Transmit Prana.
And as Kabbalistâs rod makes your basic attacks magicalâŚ
Logically, Kabbalistâs rod interacts with transmit prana.
inb4: IMC doesnât know how basic logic worksâŚ
It does a lot simply because using a mace over a rod will give you way more Aspd and the new level 350 mace has a high chance (30%) to proc 2000 additional lightning element damage per hit (it also works for every single attack line).
So why would I go for rod if I plan to autoattack and my mace can do the same thing but more often per minute and has a better sub-effect?
Also, Daino offers me the option to choose wether I want to attack physically or magically with a mace, so Krivisâs Daino isnât that bad even on a Kabbalist. Iâm going to put my 5 remaining skillpoints into Daino on my Kabbalist, because Melstis is pretty much useless for all my Classes in the build.
Revenge of the pigdogs