Why people keep saying ranger 2 is not worth?
It is as good as ranger 3 guys, given that bounce shot and spiral arrows are mediocre fillers at BEST.
You pick Ranger for barrage plus steady aim into meltis, and steady aim grows in a linear way at ranger 2 as well at 3.
And this is true on most of archer circles, u gain 1 good skill (steady aim in this case) 1 ok skill (barrage) and a lot of mediocre fillers that to be honest you could completely skip as well. In the end Ranger 1 is 5 wasted points, ranger 2 is 10 wasted points, ranger 3 is 15 wasted points.
Still, steady aim is the most retarded self buff in the game with meltis and worth ALL the circle fillers you can dedicate to it, especially if u want to et/solmiki.
Btw meanwhile clerics get immunity with leftover points, just saying 
My main is SR3/Ranger3 and, let me say again, all is worth of ranger at any circle is barrage and steady aim, if u think ranger 3 is better then ranger 2 for that sh3t 2 extra kills u gain, u are wrong.
Ranger 3 is better then ranger 2 for +5% steady aim and that’s it. Ranger 2 is better then ranger 1 for +5% steady aim and that’s it.
See the trend? And still, totally worth it.