Tree of Savior Forum

🌁 Karja's Concerns 🌁

Gameplay Feedback General Feedback
#1

how about keep the Early Access but lower the duration to 1 month. i think the player base could agree with that? since your only concern is just TP sales?

(if the marketing staff are gamers? do they understand what a 3 months advantage is in mmo or just silenced the gamer staff and proceeded?) or are you going to keep the founders in founders server once the game goes live to prevent the 3 month advantage? given that in my earlier inquiry you will not approve of any server transfers.

im desynthesize by all the years of the cash grabs in GE. i know whales :whale: in mmo gaming keep any f2p title game alive. but IMC isnt it too early for a cash grab? (3 months advantage assuming the game is even stable and you allow server transfers)

ToS hasn’t established yet which would mean your expecting ToS to fail? and conclude to have an early cash grab in anticipation? since ToS rating is failing in Korea.

woundnt it be ideal if you just released it as a B2P and gradually turn into F2P within the year once the hype goes down as to re-hype it like what other developer-publishers are doing? This would actually give it less hatred and negativity than ToS recieves now?

@STAFF_J @STAFF_John @STAFF_Ethan

1 Like
#2

RO’s release in korea was a bigger disaster than this, and the game is still alive, even nowadays…

1 Like
#3

I believe IMC Games is having issues with income,
since they turned Granado Espada too boring to be played.

#4

I don’t think extending the “early access” to 1 year will reduce hatred and negativity. It may have worked if they advertised the game from the start as B2P, but at this point it would probably look like an even bigger cash grab since making the game B2P now would just look like an extension of the “early access” period.

#5

since they turned Granado Espada too boring to be played.

10 years of P2W anniversary last Febuary. they got them whales pumping money since 2008.

@Daenerys

its too late now as they will be compared to the many early access games. it was a safer bet to be B2P annoucement earlier in their marketing.

#6

In addition to lowering the early access to 1 month, I think they should also lower the prices and merge them into the same starting date for founders. Along with clarifying how the “Exclusive Server” is going to work when F2P launches and if you can get the head accessories on all characters or if it’s a one time thing.

Also they need to expand on exactly what’s going to be in the cash shop and the prices that they will cost.

Until then I’m going to be one of those people and say “I’m out” because if they don’t change something the game is already dead… :dizzy_face:

#7

Just imagine what disaster can the first bandwagonned top guild can do when newer guilds pop out on June. They can simply wage war on anyone while keeping the level gap + gear advantage they had from playing 3 months earlier.

#8

nah they change it to be consented war. both guild leaders must agree to war. you know like civilized war in ancient history.

#9

Oh, never saw that patch note. Still though, pioneering is a huge advantage.