If Mario hurt his hand, it would stop you from playing the game. Attribute levelling does not affect your ability to play whatsoever.
Youâre getting a bonus without expending points and the longest you have to wait is like 30 minutes, during which time youâre free to quest/grind with no penalties. Attributes also count down while youâre logged off.
The waiting time for an individual attribute, while really silly, isnât all that bad. Not saying I like it, but okay, I can live with that.
What really gets me is the fact that youâre locked out from leveling anything else, which really puts me off from ever touching the ones with a wait time until I either have no credit to buy anything else anyway, or when Iâm going to log off. If they could remove that restriction itâd be much better.
Or, alternatively, only lock attributes of the same class. Like, if youâre training a Highlander skill, only lock the other highlander skills, not swordsman.
I agree with both of these statements.
Donât you guys think the game would just be better without having to wait?
I believe this mechanic could be twisted around to make a bit more sense AND provide a sense of accomplishment:
- Pay for learning the skill level;
- Use the skill;
- After N successful uses (e.g. Plate spec - damage soaked, healing - amount healed), learning is complete. You can now buy the next level.
That would be neat. What if you removed the payment from the process altogether and had individual skill XP? Use Ice Bolt xx times and its attribute would level up (obviously it would be scaled), it would make it more like your character is gaining experience with the skill instead of paying someone to make it stronger
That sounds even better, I agree!
Not really. Iâm personally against instant gratification. I think I value it more if I actually work for it.
I donât mind the 30 minute waits. I can stop in town, sell crap, buy a few enhance and then one 30 minute attribute and head back out to the field. What I really hate are the 4 minute waits, because by the time Iâve started fighting again, Iâm back to not training an attribute again and Iâm torn between continuing fighting or going back to town to start training another attribute.
So how about this as an idea. You can pay the training to increase your max rank in town, but while youâre in town the rank does not increase. Now you go out to the field and while using type of armor, or using skill, you gain experience that eventually procs the rank up of that attribute, up to the maximum rank that youâve purchased.
Now you maintain the silver sink while making the time you spend out of the field feel worthwhile instead of penalizing you for not constantly having an attribute in training.
Itâs likely built this way for future cash shop mechanics â ie buying time boosters to learn attributes faster.
If that is the case then I am fine with it staying the way it is; not game breaking for non-paying players and a nice bonus for those who do.
I am fully for being able to level a skill as you use it, but thereâd have to be some sort of limit to it so people dont just stand near a mob spawn point while having a macro running to use the skill every so often in a low level area.
As for skills with multiple attributes, perhaps theyâd be more âhiddenâ and require you to use the skill in a specific way for the attribute to unlock. It would fit the whole exploration thing the game has going too.
For example, Highlanderâs Cartar Stroke has the additional knockback attribute, but what if it wasnât mentioned until you knocked back enemies with it X amount of times? So using it for bossing wouldnât unlock it, as they canât be knocked back. Instead, that would build towards unlocking the âNo knockbackâ attribute.
I dislike paying for skill-related things in any game. I much prefer systems where skill upgrades are something you need materials or experience for.
In agreement here. Ice Bolt from Cryromancer has a chance to freeze, and an attribute that increases freeze chance. So maybe it only appears or gains xp after mobs have been successfully frozen many times.
+1
I really like the idea of gaining attribute levels based on how often you use a skill. However, I feel that the attribute system is going to be a good money sink, so I am opposed to removing the silver fee for that reason.
What about if you had to pay silver to âunlockâ the attributes, and then the attribute levelled up as you used the skill? Attributes with many levels could allow you to unlock 10 attribute levels at a time.
That definitely seems like a solid idea. It could also be done in the form of Mastery Books (you buy the books to use, that way you donât have to be in town to unlock your next level) so that thereâs still a silver fee and whatnot.
How about this?
Going off of my previous idea, when you âdiscoverâ an attribute, you need to tell your class master about your discovery. He will then allow you to train that attribute, for a fee, and you need to pay him every 10 levels you gain in that attribute.
The attack % attributes would be unlocked from the start, and require a fee every 10 levels, with the first 10 being free of charge (that still leaves however many attribute levels till cap / 10 for them to put a silver fee on along with âhiddenâ attributes)
Edit: They can even capitalize on a system like this by adding cash shop items that increase skill experience gain and reduce training fees, or âSkill Booksâ that unlock a hidden attribute right away. Quality of life stuff that speeds things up. Cashers love that kind of thing.
Iâm in agreement with all thatâs said here.
The only real problem is this:
I somewhat agree, but that just brings into question the type of morals that IMC wants to foster from Tree of Savior. Weâve already seen that there isnât a dedicated moderator online to dish out punishment to those that abuse the shout chat⌠-shakes head- Any kind of system can be abused, but itâs the ones that keep the majority of players entertained while allowing them to progress thatâre the good ones.
Unfortunately bad players with that kind of mindset will always follow the easy, unethical path. But we can always hope that theyâll be shadow-banned and only play with themselves.
Or find wandering/extremely rare/seasonal NPCs thatâll teach âultimateâ (e.g. different colors, added effects) versions of certain skills.
And he/she only takes 2-3 apprentices.
Per year.