as such RO has never been a SandBox despite some people calling it as such, which is actually just Open World
Shh, donât tell them. Youâll hurt their feelings.
Well however you want to define it, the freedom RO gave in so many areas of play is what made that game fun for me. No hand holding, total stat, skill and gear freedom. All lvling choices were up to you. They gave you PVP rooms and let you decide what to do with them and let you arrange things. And all you needed to try WoE is to be dumb and ballsy enough to go wander up there and poke your head into a portal. Sure it might get blown off but you gotta try these things XD
4 Likes
ToS is basically a fantasy open world game, but adding a bit of sandbox features wonât hurt. I think that would make the game more fun and give players more options about what they are going to do in the game.
The good times. I really loved that freedom.
its not ro-sequel but it does have some sort of elements of it!
it does have some sort of elements of it!
it only looks like RO, and thats it
Dude, I recently posted an article about Hearthstone in off-topic that got deleted .-.
Because they have a rule against âadvertising other MMOsâ wtf? XD
Was skimming through the forums to find you and the rest to be honest XD
I am sorry for off topic .w.
ON TOPIC: I totally agree that this shouldnât be a complete copy of RO but I think everyone already understands that? RO is super RIP at the moment and copying a zombie will just create another zombie⌠So yea they are really just copying what we love about RO, what makes us return to it after we quit it no matter what. But removing what actually makes us quit it⌠and that makes this game very dangerous XD
If designs is what made you think this is the spiritual successor of RO then you werenât even playing RO right. The community and the traditional gameplay was also a big part of what made RO popular and still quite strong today.
nope RO was one of the ancient mmos out there thats why RO was popular then (2002-3 you can only count with you fingers the number of mmos). Which is why IMC is using the nostalgia to market ToS.
most of the 20-30 year old users here were from those era and was their 1st ever MMORPG
1 Like
Well said. Exactly what I would have replied.
1 Like
Haha! No but really⌠we really will O_O!
estou testando minha vpn, obrigado
This. You have articulated exactly what I have attempted to tell others about what I miss most about iRO when trying other games. The character specialization and builds is something I havenât seen in any other game. For example, look at GW2; it is absolutely beautiful and has some really great group play, but zero true customization when it comes to choosing our stats and build. You literally pick a weapon and gain 5 skills, period. You can only go so far with âskinsâ.
2 Likes
I beg to differ , it doesnât have to be RO⌠however RO was one of the most innovative and interesting games I personally have played.
Itâs that creativity and interesting game mechanics ppl are looking for.
Ragnarok 2 has taken away a lot from itâs much superior original. While I agree that each game should be merited on itâs own achievements and faults. A hope will always be strong.
1 Like
Canât wait to see this up and running for everyone!
HahahahahaâŚha
I agree very hard. 
tos was never a TRUE sequel ragnarok
maybe that was the plan but errrrr greeed killed the dreams
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like