…
I don’t care if they bot since IMC don’t care but can they at least give up the innocent br girl act?
i heard blessing is amazing now
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
So you were botting…
2 Likes
ofc he was botting, he just couldn’t take it that the account was banned, ya know??
He asked you something you straight ignored a GM, and I used the term loosely, you were recording your botting like most botters do, you got caught now, don’t try to look innocent lol.
#getowned
Not sticking around
Good. He’s got a dumpster to occupy.
And of course he was botting
See my name for hue.
According to the eula and terms of service, bans are not final. However no info is given on how these unbans work.
IMC has got minimal info regarding bans in the terms of service which basically allows them to ban anyone but…whats the requirement and criteria for IMC to lift a ban? I bet no GM can answer this because they don’t seems to have a set of rules. So in conclusion, “When they feel like it”, “Darts-throwing decision making”, “Indecisive”, “Your contribution (purchases)”.
IMC and their ways of doing things.
Seems you are new to the internet and digital services.
I welcome you to 2016, please enjoy your stay after you read these vague terms of service.
1 Like
Eula and terms of service are generally not legally enforceable anyway.
1 Like
Missing Rules of Conduct, and IMC never mention permanent ban, so I assume that all bans only last 1 month, aka Suspension?
IMC uses the word ‘may not’ suggesting possibilities of player ‘may’ do the mentioned activity.
https://treeofsavior.com/ts/
http://tera.enmasse.com/legal/terms-of-service
http://tera.enmasse.com/legal/rules-of-conduct
All you have to understand is everything is at IMC’s discrection and everything is treated on a case by case basis. It’s how every video game eula works.
haha you mean thats how IMC works.
[quote]MUST -This word, or the terms “REQUIRED” or “SHALL”, mean that the definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
MUST NOT – This phrase, or the phrase “SHALL NOT”, means that the definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification.
SHOULD – This word, or the adjective “RECOMMENDED”, mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
SHOULD NOT – This phrase, or the phrase “NOT RECOMMENDED” mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior described with this label.
MAY – This word, or the adjective “OPTIONAL,” mean that an item is truly discretionary.
FUTURE – This word means that objectives are provided as guidance or expectation and may or may not be accurate.
SEPARATION – This word means the prevention of reach-ability to designated resources.
From http://etherealmind.com/requirements-terminology/
[/quote]
The rules are optional which is why ToS is full of hackers and cheaters.
1 Like
Like I said, welcome to 2016 and online gaming time traveler from 1800.
Also a few other notes time traveller.
The cubs have won another world series, yes it took a century.
You should of skipped to 2050, when we’re playing wow killer, world of starcraft on our moon bases. What a bad time to choose.
gotta teach IMC how to time travel.
I can teach you both, but first you gotta read my vague EULA.
HUUUUUUUUUUUEEEE hue
first, you are going to need to build a hot tub if you are going to time travel.
i have enough autism without tos, no real point coming back to this game
when it comes to vidya we mostly play final fantasy 14 and csgo (’‘hacked’’ my way to supreme so far) fortunately valve dont ban players just cuz they feel like it 
anyhow this is my last post here… so here is a cool picture of a boidog
take care now 
4 Likes