There should only be 1 ranking. What i have been doing this week is did 1day of 5v5 on monday and that got me to #21 then i stopped doing it. When i checked yesterday which is saturday i am still #21. Meanwhile i lost a ton of games in 2v2 but that doesnt affect my 5v5. When the week ends it takes your best ranking.
Maybe there should just be 1ranking instead of 2 separate ones.
Discuss.
I mean they could keep the ranking, but atleast differentiate between 5 man TBL and 2 man TBL.
That you’ve got 2 number 1 on the same map makes no sense, and you can only check who’s won on 5 v 5 by checking on fedimian, and that’s only for the first 5 players.
I mean why differentiate between the 2 anyways? 5v5 or 2v2 it’s basically the same thing. Yea sure some builds do better in 5v5 or 2v2 in particular, but generally people who do well in 5v5 also do well in 2v2 and vice versa.
Sure they both have the same small arena, they both have players and both have those players trying to kill eachother.
But one has 2,5 more players than the other, it is a more wacky enviroment that probably should be differentiate from its more tame sibling, and infact it is with those silly statues. but for some reason they didn’t go all the way.
Just another point on the long list of PVP problems in the game…
[RESOLVED] , I guess
huehuehue
same rank list for 2v2 and 5v5 wont work. they should just implement minimal number of games per week to have a rank. that way there is less “luck” factor when some1 is ranked high.
Thats also bad for ppl who cant play a lot
i think a minimum of 10 matches or even 15 is fair to deserve a rank…
if u cant even play that many matches in a week… u cant really accomplish anything in tos lol
Isnt that a lot of time when average time waiting is 20 minutes per match so that is 4 hours of TBL just for a ranking?
Only the 5v5 is the officially ranked I believe (which will make the rank # show up next to your name).
2v2 does track its own ranking but that’s about it. When you change mode (5v5 or 2v2) the ranking list will change accordingly.
idk about other servers but NA servers: Orsha/Klaipedia isnt THAT long most nights.
also this will encourage players to que more that rank beside their name lol
Im on orsha sometimes it is that long
2v2 also gives u the ranking
It has ranking but does it show the ranking next to your name?
Meaning if you do zero 5v5 matches for a week and only 2v2 matches, at the end of the week it’ll show the 2v2 ranking next to the name?
Yes , i got the number for the previous 2 weeks based on my 2v2, this week based on my 5v5
It is whichever is highest. If you are ranked in both. Under the current system it makes sense to play in both.
I see I guess they should remove the 2v2 ranking showing #s then lol
I do not find the need to remove the 2 v 2 numbers from people. I do find the need to differentiate them. Right now there’s nothing else than this game’s sorry excuse of PvP to do. So, some players have taken it as their goal to reach a particular ranking in either arena, Their reward? said number displaying next to their name.
Taking rewards away from players in the current sorry state of the game is not a right move, but, atleast putting a roman V or a roman II to differentiate the ranking (perhaps not the best solution, people would think that the II is better) would avoid a small degree of confusion that I cannot say for sure it even exist.
But to differentiate the ranking displayed would only be a justice for those that participated in the 5 v 5 arena.
There is no point talking about ranking in this game :
the ranking is completly bugued and rarely reset. (last reset in NA was 1 month ago - and I can remember a time where the ranking didn’t reset for 3 month) That bug exist since tbl was launched so we can’t expect a fix soon.
ranking give nothing beside that star, which like the ranking often bug. As bug it can just never appear on your char even thought you were ranked, or secondly can take whichever rank from 22 or 55 randomly even if that rank is lower than the other. (last week I got my rank from 22 which is almost 10 rank under my 55 one)
Rank mostly come from your luck with the matchmaking up to a certain point, etc, but that’s not really a worth point talking in this topic.
As long ranking in tbl is bugued there is no point asking for a minimum number of match before it count, since with ranking never reset, for people who get high or low in the ranking, matchmaking take a really long time (beside often bugued for a few people) making it impossible to get more than 1-2 game in a whole hour of queuing. (and that’s hoping that there are still people playing - last week I counted only 3 different 55 match for the whole 5 weekdays (not mine))
Yeah I don’t think people care about these rankings at all lol. At least I don’t.
But they should remove 2v2 from showing the ranks since only the 5v5 has (rank) next to it, indicating that 2v2 should be unranked.
sigh is there something in this game that isn’t broken? I’m impressed at how broken things can get, it defies common sense, I guess I wasn’t ready for IMC’s take on software and game design.