is it working as intended now?
and how exactly does it work?
does equipping 8 10* cards give me 80% or 8 chance of 10%
does it work with well with sneak hit?
does it make skills rear hit too? cuz i remember reading something before that it only works with auto attack
YES. Just don’t get that dagger attribute. It takes away the effect of the cards for some reason.
YES.
YES.
YES, I guess it should - at least with Backstab and Hacka skills when I was testing it.
1 Like
oh cool
but are you really sure about this one?
lol, just realize the real werewolf is bipedal and the one pictured in the card is just a mere wolf because of quadrupedal
3 Likes
so how much critical rate(%) do u actually get when u combined sneak hit and those wolfcards?
u got 7 so 70% and im guessing u only got lvl 5 sneak hit so that 40%
so u got 70% to trigger that 40%…if my calculations were right, it should give u 28% critical rate
and if u have 8 lvl 10 cards and lvl 15 sneak hit
thats 80% to trigger 60% that equals to 48%…again if my calculations were right
Bruh, I can crouch down on all fours too. Doesn’t mean I’m not bipedal.
Anyway the only problem with WW cards was that it didn’t work with Backstab and Karacha set. You still had to actually be behind the enemy to get the bonus damage, which meant your Backstab was way weaker from the front. I don’t know if that’s fixed now but I doubt it.
1 Like
no, it works separately, more like
If isSneakHit AND [(isRealRearAttack) OR (random(100)<WWTotalStar)]
then critchance:+=40%
whhhhaaaaaatttt?
i didnt understand your formula…so make it simple for me…8 pcs 10 stars WW cards and lvl 15 sneak hit(60%)
how much crit rate do i get from your formula?
if it is real rear attack, your critchance +60%
if it is not rear attack then the system will generate random number X between 1-100 (for example X=75) and check if X is lower than your werewolf total star (for example your WW card is 8x10star=80star). In this example 75<80 then your critchance +60%
If your generated X is 81 then you wont get bonus +60% crit chance
wtf? where did u get this formula? is this official?
based on my observation using WW cards since november 2016. you dont trust me?
the were wolf on the card is walking like that because she ate too many other cards to level up
ok i read your formula again and its pretty much the same as 80% of triggering 60%,u just made it fancy lol
but it is not the same as 80x60=bonus 48% to your initial crit chance,X%+48%. your crit chance will always be X%+60% when WW trigerred
or only X% when not
crit rate is your readable stats when you press F1
crit chance is your critrate^0.6
why is it not the same? you said u generate a random number from 1-100 and if u get a number equal or lower than your card’s total stars u get the +60% bonus
in the example the card’s star is 80, and 80 of 100 is 80%
so thats 80% to trigger 60%
correct
incorrect!
do you have 468 crit rate right now? 468^0.6=40% crit chance.
if your 2nd quote is true then your total critchance is 40%+48%=88% fixed right?(88 out of 100 attack will crit)
meanwhile mine is 40%+60%=100% IF it is real rear attack or WW are triggered… If not then it is still 40%.
Test it and prove me wrong
try attacking enemies 1000 times from the front without weapon and count how many you crit.
If you understand programing, that 80% from werewolf isnt under the same instance/variable as critchance, so those 80% can not be multiplied together with 60% critchance bonus from sneakhit
wtf its just the same, you are just making it fancy again
so based on your example
my calculation will give me 88% chance
with your formula its 80%(when WW is triggered) to do 100%
if WW is not triggered its just 40%
so u got 20% to do 40%
and 20% of 40% is 8%
so 80%+8% is 88%
wtf?
Test it and prove me wrong. and stay civilized, please
i dont have the cards yet and im unsure of its effect thats why i made this topic, to ask infos about it
but u keep confusing me, by telling me that my understanding of the card’s effect is wrong and that my calculation were all incorrect and that your formula is the correct one, but they are just the same, both getting the same result