Hello Guys,
Can you help me to clarify my thoughts? I started playing thinking in this build: Cleric>Priest>Priest>Cleric>Priest>Oracle>Oracle / 3:2:2 (SPR:INT:CON).
So I have two things in my mind (after play the game):
I am thinking to use 2:2:1 instead 3:2:2 (for a better Heal using the cleric skill), sounds better?
And
Is really an Oracle Support a real thing? Someone already have some expertise with it?
not sure if that qualifies as the usual full support that you need in the endgame. im doing something similar, its a mix of a build someone already tested and was useful and oracle. currently c1-p3-chaplain, will take c2 next and oracle. 2:1 spr:con. i have nice aa damage, buffs are especially nice for quarrel shooters. many say that chaplain falls off late game because no on uses AA, but in all my dungeons up to lvl 190 all i see are players with generally bad builds or basic builds spamming all heir attacks and then auto attacking the rest of the mobs for over a minute…
i chose c2 for the better heal safety zone and divine might. but mainly the heal. i want to take oracle to have some fun, i already have two min maxxed builds. oracle doesnt bring much to the table but its a fun class. i dont think change needs to be higher than lvl 5 and death sentence isnt good enough to warrent oracle 2. 40s to kill one mob and its not even a boss…my dps build slaughter mobs in less than 5 seconds and en masse. the sp/stamina buff might be nice, but we have pots for those. what i dont know is if you would need a lvl 10 change + divine might+a gem, so essentially a lvl 12 change for some uber rare mob, or maybe we get oracle 3 with a game changing skill. i lean towards cleric2, but having a future proof build woud be nice.