It has the potential to be a fantastic gem.Some positivity is great and I’m glad you like the game,but to call it this good already is being blind to the issues.
If you meant class variety,then I might agree with you.But the development is very shakey at best,and balancing leaves a lot to be desired.
Although I wasn’t around when the concept of it came out,the game has been in development for some years.They could have been way more prepared than they were/are.
Young and old games alike have bots,the difference being that IMC wanted so badly to prevent bots and RMT that they ended up crippling the experience for legitimate players.And guess what? We still have both of those things happening.
This I agree with,but they need to more seriously moderate the forums to control that at this point.As well as just fix their game.Almost all of the BS posted here would stop if they fixed what was complained about.
I agree it needs more aggressive promoting,but yes,only after they fix most if not all the issues plaguing the game.Right now new players are met with old and current players bashing the game,but it’s deserved and that is on IMC to resolve.Best advice to new players is to go into it with an open mind [and research classes first].
The existence of the Token quite literally disproves this.It’s literally offering you a better experience for about $9-10,because although you don’t have to spend money,they need to make it to stay afloat.They get this money by offering you exactly that,a difference in gameplay.Extra dungeon runs,+3 move speed,more item listings on the Market,slightly less limited trading,+30% EXP and premium gestures.The difference is noticable,so this simply is not true.
This won’t ever happen.Differing opinions aside,games follow trends that make them money.This is all because they want to make money,and they will do a mix of what makes them the most,and what people can be happy with/tolerate.100% F2P is not one of those things.
I believe @IMCisGreedy or @Siete made a recent topic about it,but the playerbase is neither strong or consistent. This is true after the big update as well,which isn’t good.
This I can agree on with nothing else to add.Probably the simplest thing they could do.