Its ok to a squire to be a afk utilitty but a templar? the guild leader? really IMC? @STAFF_Amy @STAFF_Max @STAFF_Ethan @STAFF_Ines @STAFF_Yuri @STAFF_Letitia
What about an AD store for your guild lol. It receives applies and can showcase stuff from your guild
Can you comment how they this guy have high aspergillum? TP affecting aspergillum?
Asperlgium is based on your matk, so your weapon matk will make asperlgium line better. And with the new atk-def formula, the more matk you have, the more dmg you will do from getting more matk from int, than frome getting elemental dmg on additional lines technically.
For Transmit Prana for one day it worked on chaplain auto atk, and the next day, when it worked back on OOB, it didnāt work anymore on chaplain autos.
They could also have patched it and retest again, but if i remember itās yesterday or the 5. (the day when the video was posted, that the patch that removed transmit prana affecting chaplains autos to work).
But technically transmit prana could affect āaspperlgium lineā since itās a magic spell at basis. So maybe chaplain + Sadhu3 isnāt completely dead, just that transmit prana will affect only one line, that is if you go up to Chaplain ^^
Edit : but anyway that doesnāt change the fact, you have nearly as good auto atk line, if you go with full int build than with spr on chaplain. Same for spells. Just weaker buffs. And If you go Sadhu3 and get tarnsmit prana youāll get even better buff from your int since it gives matk. ^^
Edit 2 : So his basic atk deal 4408 dlg arround.
His Asperlgium line deal arround 17 000
letās first remove blessing if heās full int his blessing is arround 674, while if heās full spr itās arround 1 484.
So int = 3734 atk line / 16 326 asperlgium line
So spr = 2924 atk line / 15 516 asperlgium line
Letās now remove the dmg from sacrament and last rites on the line. They are both equal to your spr. If heās a full spr weāll say itās arround 350 for each. So letās minus 748 again to spr line. To int line, we remove only 48cause itā sonly affect by spr.
Int = 3686 atk / 16 278 asperl
Spr = 2176 atk / 13 340 asperl.
Now letās think about the fact atk and matk are the same for spr build. + factor at max on aspersion line. For int build we have 875 more matk so weāll had this to know how much matk we get.
Int = 4561 matk / 16 278 asperl (asperl donāt change cause weāre sure of the dmg)
Spr = 2176 matk / 13 340.
Letās take into account max factor of Aspersion 15. Cause with the number of spell he have i think he builded himself this way.
We have 322% / 483% if maxed attribute. So letās base ourselves on both.
Int = 45613.22 = 14 686 (0% attrib) / 45614.83 = 22029 (maxed attrib)
Spr = 21763.22 = 7006 / 21764.83 = 10 510.
So if he is spr, with maxed attribute he miss arround 3K dmg.
If he is full int with 0% attribute he miss arround 2K dmg.
He has a good weapon, but we donāt know enhance, transcend etc either. So canāt be sure for one or another. But technically it means Transmit Prana affect aspersion, and so affect asperlgium line. ^^
(The other results are too far off to be his actual build. He could also have a build with an in between of for example 3/1 int/spr, itās kinda hard to comment if you donāt have the stats of the build himself).
Itās ok but templars need to be the true leader of guild in guild events and gvg and not a AFK character
First we need to see C3. They could have made C1-C2 not that good to give a really powerfull C3 support or damage. So people who had the patience to level their templar would get good things from it . ^^
I donāt think a good C3 is justification for shitty C1/C2, it just creates boring builds.
Just like the new Linker? : ^)
hi welcome to tree of savior
Whats the pelta change? ( I know its not high guard sadly.)
after these changes, deprotected zone defense weakened attribute seems broken. I remember reading a post that says that after triggering the attribute 10x, it becomes armor break status. If anybody can test if each stack of this attribute is still 10% in the current ktos/ktest, that would be nice. They might have reduced the armor reduction per sword hit or completely removed the armor break effect. Itāsjust that armor break in the current mechanics is too op
Deprotected zone doesnt work that way.
To better explain:
Deprotected zone is a circle that debuffs enemies standing on it every second.
Every second the enemy is standing on the circle the debuff stacks and they lose armor.
The thing you are talking about is its attribute. After 10 sword basic attacks, armor break status activates on the enemy. Nothing else happens in between.
Unless theyāve changed it since Iāve last used it, thatās it.
Yeah i did say attribute, I know how dpzone works. With attack speed right now or even just a doppel spinning on an enemy with dp zone will stack the attribute quick enough to cause armor break. It wasnāt noticeable before since armor break wasnt such a big deal but current formula makes armor breaking a mutiplier for damage
Will it be imbalanced for PvE or PvP?
I donāt know about the new bosses, but Iām guessing you will either kill normal monsters fast enough to render the attribute useless, and it wonāt be significant enough against bosses (or theyāll jump away right after it gets casted like they always doā¦).
In PvP, most people are already doomed if they are stuck long enough to proc it, or have too much HP for it to matter too much. It may be useful in some situations, but itās probably unlikely enough for it to be rated as a ābrokenā skill even with the heightened attack speeds?
Is Nyx armor still better then virtov on ktos?
Want to farm my second set for my cata but not sure if it will be viable after the patch ā¦
What the actual ā ā ā ā ?
Probably has 10k+ matk with chappa cards active, any circle with that much matk can melt this boss. Plus even if this was good, it has fairly long cooldown. So its k.
she have use dig + the explosion skill from alchemist that have a 1,9k% and her dig is level 15 it seems because the number of items, so you have 15x1,9k% if both skills are 15 or if only dig is 15 it is 15x1k%, and so on.