On one hand, I reeeeeally hope Inquisitor is actually a R4 continuation that boosts Paladin’s potential through the roof.
On the other, it’d really shaft the Magic DPS Clerics. Eh, they need to get shafted abit anyway, they have Druid3, PD2 and Kabba2.
Dude I wan Inquisitor to be Paladin Reloaded so bad, I’d bring back my Krivis/paladin back if that happens because it’d seal the deal of the “Classes no one sees anymore becasue Pardoners” build.
Some reword in Paladin would still be quite appreciated, still.
Lol, plz.
I don`t want more people running my build. 
I’m sure we ain’t even in the same server, don’t worry about eeet.
It was fun ICBT2, if slow.
Not really, since if it’s a Paladin R4 that means it’s a hidden class, so Cleric will get two normal R8s anyway.
Actually a Paladin R4 would make a lot of sense, since before Chaplain was added Pardoners made some of Priest’s core skills obsolete with spell shop and they do the same to Paladin with Barrier scrolls.
Well, it doesn’t need to be an traight up “C4” thing like Chaplain.
See Lancer which seems like the logical progression from Cathaphract as a PvP class yet there’s a blank rank between the two.
Fine then!
/20gimmebunnyboycostume
All Paladins and Monks will have no choice but to jump on the Inquisitor bandwagon anyway.
That is, if Inquisitor is physical. Heheh.
Obviously Inquisitor will be mixed.
No one expects the spanish inquisition after all!
Lancer actually appears to have a very different role in combat than Cataphract. Cata seems to be a much more straight up offense class for getting in quickly, dealing a decent amount of damage, and having the persistent speed from trot to stick to someone, while Lancer seems like more of a frontline utility class since it has no strictly damaging abilities, all of its skills are focused around breaking through enemy lines and creating chaos by wrecking magic and even shoving people off their mounts.
Obviously you could go Cata->Lancer and I’m sure it’d work out fine, but I don’t think you strictly have to go Lancer if you go Cata, nor do you have to go Cata before Lancer. A Catagoon build still makes perfect sense for all out offense, while Lancer I could actually see being used with Rodelero and Corsair, for example, to be the ultimate nuisance. Cata also remains a viable PVE class (at least as viable as Swordsman PVE classes get), while Lancer really seems to ONLY exist for PVP, and in particular GVG.
I’m actually considering Lancer for my Corsair3’s rank 8 but a lot of that comes down to the fact that nothing else makes much sense. Hopefully they make pistol shot usable while mounted.
That is, if you are not required to be mounted to use Lancer skills, like Cata.
If you must be mounted, then it is Cata C4. 
I would love to take Lancer to a non-mounted Dragoon build I am planning tho.
We don’t need another Paladin or Monk. We just need something with better synergies to them than what we have now.
But that could be Daoshi too…
I think one of the Kabbalist c2 skills will be physical too and c1 already have skills that would benefit anybody.
…even Plague could have some surprises…
So I personally don’t expect anything from Inquisitor… but I rly hope there will be options for everybody out there on R8.
I’m rly excited…and I will be disappointed too if it turns out there is nothing…xD
I’ve actually never mentioned it in this thread, but i’ll be happy to elaborate about their features for you.
inb4 inquisitor is just cleric on a mount
imc mount fetish strikes again
Gotta cash those new penguins". I just tried to impersonate you.
oh and they get swords in offhand too
Daoshi is from Chinese culture and i can’t imagine its skills are mainly physical, cuz Daoshi isn’t in line with physical skills and Monk already has those physical skills.
BTW, Monk icon is also related with Daoshi.
That’s flawed logic. There are actually relatively few skills you can’t use while mounted now, we’re not working with the same limitations Cata faced once upon a time.
I’d be fine with that. Cleric doesn’t have a mounted class yet, not even a pseudo-mounted class like Sorcerer.
i thik that daoshi will be the next circle for monks, for my paladin, im going c2 kabbalist. inquisitor im 90% sure will be magical dps.
daoshi is gonna be based on astrology bcuz thats what taoism is about, so im expecting chineese dragons and whatnot
I rly don’t know what to expect from it… They definitely won’t be as physical oriented as monks… in that matter they could be closer to Paladins actually who has magic and physical too…
All I wanted to say that I think there are possibilities in every upcoming circles and classes so I rly wouldn’t say it will be the Inquisitor who will fit well with Paladins or Monks.
All we can do is wait a bit more and hope physical builds are in IMCs mind too not just in ours…X)