Tree of Savior Forum

Help with my Inquister build

hey guy im newbie and i plan to be cl2 kri pala3 x inq

btw its first char and i want it can do PvE ET even a little farming and PVP sometime

what that x i should pick to filler PD/Kab/Monk ?? can u guys give me some suggest

about stat if i go monk just invest dex at 100 is ok ?
and if go PD/Kab dex at 40-60 is it ok ?
con 50 rest str

thanks

Why would you go Krivis C1?
Krivis is getting changed, so all you’d get out of it is changing your attacks to magic type with the new Daino and/or -50/-70 crit resistance with Zalciai.
C1 neither features DoT Divine Stigma nor does it allow you to make your Aukuras useful with the new additional fire property damage boost.

thanks for reply btw now i play in THTos and it only patch before card system change still old krivis and personaly like paladin and im not a fan of priest its too many priest in server and i annoyed it and im fix only cl2 and pala3 first i think i will go cl2 kri2 pal3 tao but my friend said this is no dmg and suggest me to go pala inq instead

i want to focus on ET then i take krivis for daino and against priest at r3 now im Cl2 kri1 pala1

what u think about the build cl2kri2pal3tao i plan it for waiting new krivis and paladin is it good or inq is better

i have restat potion btw still can go both build

and can u advice a stat that i should go for both build

thanks again

If you want to focus on ET Priest 1 or 2 would be a nice asset… They’re the only class who can resurrect that easily, that’s the reason why there are so many of them. Because in ET you cannot use the soul crystals to revive, and you have to reclimb all the stairs. It’s also nice for PvP.

Paladin is nice for support and defensive skills/buffs (not sure if you’ve seen the damages they’re gonna make to the class ?). Its attack isn’t amazing, but it’s decent. Most people who take Paladin go Inquisitor as well because they’re both physical, and Inquisitor brings good damage synergy with Paladin (Wheel > Conviction > God Smash > Smite).

If you want to go PvP you’ll need more than 50 CON. And PvP makes you need different classes than PvE (Kabba/PD in PvP is great, PD works in PvE as well, Taoist is more PvE).

To be honest it feels like you’re trying too much to go all over the place. Krivis 3 + Taoist can be a good combo with the Storm Calling and Krivis’ level 15 Zaibas (and the next buffs), but it’s a magical build. Paladin is physical for damages, and for defense/support it’s SPR.

thanks for sharing i know it about priest in ET but in my mind (personaly opinion) if u can get benefit from priest only resurect and other cleric always take it then i think its better to take other class to fill, and like i said every build have priest. its ok if i go full sup or buff cleric but inq dont want priest for that reason i think it not worth for

I’ve a char with a similar build, i picked priest at R3 and it’s almost useless (yeah, you have ressurect, but every party will have a priest C3 that can do that for you).
I think you should pick Dievdirbys at R3, you will have an adittional skill for damage, CD reduction, SP reduction and warp, they’re all you need as Paladin C3 - Inq consume mana as ■■■■ and have long CD’s.
If you don’t want to use too many mana potion I recommend Kabbalist at R7, Ein Sof is just great as it recover all your mana and buff your self-heals(something you’ll need as you have no INT), if you dont mind the mana potions pick Monk.
For stats go 130+/- in DEX(with equip), 50-100 in CON and the rest in STR.

I’m currently trying out Cleric2>Krivis3>Paladin3, going for Taoist at next Rank (Rank 9).
It performs okish, the problem is that Divine Stigma doesn’t have any damage effect and that gruesome CD time currently, so the build doesn’t look that good.
However, once the Krivis changes are applied, the build will be one of the best supporter builds available, and sport at least as much damage as any Pala->Inquisitor build.

The problem of Inquisitor is the high attribute costs of his skills to be viable, while Krivis&Taoist is already strong with little investments compared to this.
Krivis/Taoist also doesn’t need to invest into AoE attack ratio equipment, his skills can hit 5-7 targets without a problem.
And against Boss monsters, Creeping Death Charm is a pretty strong burst skill that easily outperforms Inquisitors God Smash thanks to the many individual hits that carry additional damage from Blessing,Aukuras(new C2 attribute adds fire property damage) and Sacrament.

I see. Personally I’m always the only Cleric with Priest. A lot of Clerics on NA don’t take Priest, and often I’m even the only Cleric, so that’s why to me it’s so great to have.

If you don’t want to focus on physical damages, just ditch Inquisitor. It’s a good class, but I don’t see it bring that much to ET.
For ET/PvE, Taoist will definitely bring you more. It became one of my favourite classes for PvE, it just has everything: good damages, good buffs, and protection/laziness with Dark Sight.

I don’t know if you’ve seen the changes to Krivis :

  • Aukuras: Goddess of Fire attribute (Circle 2) allows you to reduce the duration of Aukuras by 80% and the cooldown to 30 seconds, while adding Fire property damage to magic attacks on nearby enemies based on your INT/SPR.
  • Divine Stigma, now with a fixed duration of 15 seconds and cooldown reduced to 6 seconds, we’re adding a DOT attack function that applies additional Fire property magic damage every second. Not only that, enemies affected by the Divine Stigma debuff receive 1.5 more damage from skill Zaibas. Divine Stigma is also getting a new Demon Slayer attribute, which increases damage on Demon-type enemies, and a regular Enhance attribute.
  • We’re removing all limitations of the maximum number of buffs and turning Daino into a skill that changes your basic attacks into magic ones. Attacks performed under Daino will have no block, evasion or critical, and they will rely on your INT stat for added value.

With the Taoist-Krivis synergy + the fact Divine Stigma will boost even more Zaibas, going Krivis 3-Taoist will get much better. That’s why it feels a bit like a shame to just go Krivis 2. But it would still work, just not as much damages. Paladin would be only for support as well. You could go Krivis 3 at R9 anyway, or keep going with Taoist 2.
If you go Taoist, don’t invest in any STR or DEX. Your Paladin will focus on support, his attack skills won’t be part of your main damages rotation. You should go INT, to focus on your Taoist and Krivis classes.

(On a side note, if you’re sure you’ll always have several Clerics/Priests in your parties, you could just ditch Cleric 2… Cleric 1 -> Krivis 3 -> Paladin 3 -> Taoist. Focus on buffs, debuffs and damages, not heals. 1 Cleric with Heal 10 is normally good enough to heal the party.)

How about this build in PvP? I need some advice plzzz
Cleric1 - Krivis2 - Paladin3 - Kaba1 - Inquistor
100 Con - 120 Dex - rest Str

yes its answer all my question thanks i know about new krivis change thats why i plan to do krivis but if u said inq is a dps in ET and taoist is popular than that then i should plan to taoist is better i should go there btw its ok to go cl2 kri3 x x tao2 anymore suggestion ?

ps sry bad english

its new knowledge for me thanks for sharing and can i ask something im newbie in this forum how to copy a other comment like u did idk how to do it and i need it to ask something next time

all you need is to mark the portion of the text you want to quote with your mouse and then move your mouse on top of it; it will show a grey box/button that states “Quote”. Press that button and the marked part of the post you want to quote will automatically be posted inside your text window.

Cleric 2 - Krivis 3 - X - X - Taoist 2 is fine too, of course.
Then you just have to decide what you want to fill it with… Utility, like Diev 1/2 ? Extra damages with Bokor 2 or Druid 2 ? PD at R7 for more damages, Healing Factor, and debuff protection ? Miko for meme, extra buffs and damages ?

test test`//20charsss

thanks for all answer / comment btw