So, i dont know if a go Wiz1+Pyro1+Link1+Pyro2+Pyro3 or Wiz1+Pyro1+Pyro+2+Link1+Pyro3 and necromancer in rank 6, any advice? Thanks
Buid:
Any time someone chooses Linker, I instantly feel compelled to recommend picking up Elementalist for Electrocute. Linker’s Joint Penalty provides a bonus to lightning attacks from one of its attributes. Damage be brutal.
I’m not looking at the calc atm, but overall he’d still be equal in damage if not higher damage by going pyro 3 instead of 2 and ele due to electrocute being a long cd and having stronger skills via higher pyro rank.
Necro > ele would be a flavor thing for me, but summons may still be better than ele due to already having strong skills for bosses and aoe and spammable fireball to make up for knowing less skills without ele’s list.
I myself would consider going a 2nd rank into linker for more bind uptime making full duration pyro aoe skills more likely and giving more targets to joint penalty. build being wiz, pyro, linker, pyro 2, linker 2, pyro 3.
I considered the build, but i really want test Necromancer and i think with Pyro C3 i will have a considerable damage.
In my head i think if u do make a Elementalist is better get Wizard C3 , because all skills of elementalist and the most effective “Meteor” have a HIGH … REALLY HIGH cast ( 10s man, WTF is this!)
actually, I find ele builds to find more value without going meteor and wiz 3 unless you party with others that have cc you can use to get the cast off. also remember linker 2’s bind is 10 seconds, so with proper positioning unless mobs hit you from range you could get off that 10s cast.
ele has considerable strength but its weakness lies in long cds. wiz does not provide enough abilities nor the damage during ele’s cds to make up for this.
textbook build for Pyros is 15/15/10 Fireball/Ground/Pillar. The rest is dumped into enchant fire.