I wonder if IMC cant figure something that simple or just dnt care…
Tree of Savior is geting a “Good game Bad devs” reputation very fast.
Already a thread about it bruh
Steam is full of crying kids, who the hell pays attention to steam reviews, i imagine the same people that pay attention to meta critic these days. This game is CLEARLY a good game and CLEARLY better then just about any other mmo F2P or otherwise offered as a steam app and not its own entity.
If you care about steam reviews you fall into the “kids section” bro.
Obviouslly u failed to understand what my post is about…
Your post is a bunch of whining about some kids posting steam reviews. YOU fail to miss the point that steam reviews dont mean anything these days.
No u fail, my post is about basic deduction skills, professional management, how reputation affects the future of a game, etc.
And please dnt mistake me for a hater u fanbro, i like ToS and i want THE BEST FOR IT!
More accurate is probably average game bad developers.
The steam review is obviously filled with raging kids over the instability of the servers during “early access” aka “open beta”.
It doesn’t represent the game content at all. Server issues != game content if you get what I mean.
Just give IMC time, server issues can be fix over time. It’s not as if ToS is a crappy unicorn farm game.
Okay there is over 3000+ reviews who is going to read all 3000+ be realistic here…
I’ve read a number of negative/positive reviews today in fact because of downtime and a number of them are from people who have a game time clocked in 0.5 hours… they possibly only just played the tutorial part of the game before reviewing…
No, they didn’t even get into game.
Those complaints are from people who thought it was “free to play” until they realized they had to pay for early access.
(You can still download the game and rack up time without paying for a founder’s pack)
Prolly left the game open while researching why they can’t get in then wrote a review.
Fanbro ? LOL confirmed 12yrs old.
wait really? that would now invalidate most reviews then lol thanks for pointing that out.
Woa u quessed my real age u are very very smart fanbro but i wonder if im 12yo… but… but… how i played KRO cb being 12yo??? now im really worried about space/time continium…
PD LOL
paywall where?
u dont pay anything idiot it’s f2p…
simon google paywall pls
Back to topic
Time played by reviewers not invalidates the fact im taliking about, this situation was easy to predict and avoit.
I think he means the EA people what if it told you this your not paying for the game your paying for the EA the game as we know it after a set date is free.
People are missing the point. Regardless of whether the majority of the negative reviews on steam are just a bunch of whiny kids, If you care to actually look at the helpful reviews (most of which are negative, btw), all of those reviews have VALID POINTS.
only denial whiteknight don’t care when their “best game ever” get negative review or a bad score
but the devs do, It’s gonna hurt their sales. That’s why review embargo exist kid.
can you swear that most helpful negative ToS review on steam is lying ?
they have no valid points…
most of those negativ is because they dont like the game. and start saying crap… its the same with all other games.
people say crap for games they dont play
the thing is how many of those negative reviews have facts and evidence to there claim…