OP was making a valid point, comments targeted the wrong point…
OP was showing how @STAFF_Max handled 2 different cases:
-
a player appealing because he got banned
-
a player who used a widely known chat exploit
in case 1:
the player was complaining that he got banned, with no context to support his claims of innocence, he threatens to take legal action…
suddenly STAFF_Max comes in saying the player got temporarily banned for 30 days for BOTTING, an offense we all know should be permanently bannable, what was the due process that made the player innocent and had his account only temporarily banned and not permanent?
…we don’t know, only STAFF_Max knows
in case 2:
a player was seen using a chat exploit that made the text appear large and bold
suddenly STAFF_Max comes in and PERMA-BANS the player without asking for more evidence, only basing his actions on a picture that could very well be shopped, why didn’t he ask for more proof? why did he quickly PERMA-BANNED the player?
…we don’t know, only STAFF_Max knows
#STAFF_Max, he knows!
^will i get banned for using headers now?
OP was trying to show us a possible abuse in power where actions and punishments were handed out without due process, at least those visible to us