credits to the owner
Any warrior without Peltasta 1.
I wish it werenât true, but unfortunately it is.
Donât do it unless youâre going 3 too⌠
True pirates go full tank.
Any Swordsman without Pelasta.
A linker without a link.
Thereâs no attacks beyond combustion, but as a support itâs almost as useful as a level 1 cleric.
Why is everyone saying that swordmans are useless without peltasta?
Really want to know
Theyâre not necessarily. A Swordsman 3 is great for PvP and AoE due to Restrain proccing so much and causing stun. Swordsman 2 to most has too low of a proc rate unless your doing some serious DPS, and even then the other buffs arenât that great end game. Pelt however is great for mobbing due to an auto-pull skill. Very hard to get a party late game without it due to our DPS not being as good as an archer or mage - we get locked in the tank niche, either through high HP or dodge.
Iâm not commenting on Highlander. I hear itâs a little broken and it just didnât interest me enough to go into it.
Hereâs my build if anyone seriously wants to try it.
HAHAHA I DARE YâALL I MADE IT PAST 200 SOMEHOW DO IT (and for people wondering wtf chrono without chrono3 is useless: i agree)
The main reason is that their DPS falls off hard after 200, to the point where they do half as much as an archer or elementalist. Thus, the thing theyâre wanted for 200+ is for swashbuckling so the rest of the party can AOE them all to death.
The worst build, is a build built entirely around a (bad) meme.
No advances afterward. Scotland is all you need.
Now I understand it, thanks! Swordmans are used as bells for monster XD
