Tree of Savior Forum

PvP cata-goon build

too early to count ur chickens.

at lv2 dragoon2, they already get most of their tool kit for more dps.

other class need more job level to maximize dps. Going to need to wait till people at least lv8 or something.

but at least we know dragoon2 is pretty good =p

Sorry to diminish your hopes brothers. The sad truth.:joy::neutral_face:

I tested it a while ago with 2 low level 1h spears, didn’t record or anything , just wanted to check. Maybe this changed after the patch? idts but it might be worth a shot, if you want to bring us a nice video I’m sure no one would complain. Nice lvl60 rush, that spear sounds dreamy lol Kaen is selling a +12 maga I believe for 12M or so in Orsha

is dragoon c1-2 really worth to take? as im currently at s1>s2>hop1>cata1 , i was thinking getting either s3 or hop2 for enhancing skills at rank 7 then go for lancer rank 8.

actually now when items are not standardized in TBL its even better
i can bring my +12 superior bandit gloves with double green gems and my full accuracy+physical attack head gear

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

if it means im gonna maximize pvp performance
im glad to follow a meta build :smiley:
im having fun being among the top 20 2v2 every week :slight_smile:

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

and what made you assume that? :smiley:
do you know my swordie build?

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

That attri is hard to test… you need to have a same upgraded magas and brandish to test it then try it on a duel…

Woot. late reading this. I just settled for the max peta now haha…no more moneyzzzz zzz

full dex sucks, just like full str sucks just like full int sucks.
i don’t about ur specific swordsman about not adding any con AT ALL is bad for pvp.
some str can come in handy as well, if you want a better chance at kiling wizards but isn’t necessary (im still in favor of a hybrid build especially for pvp it seems like a good balance)
for a swordsman who wants to pure pvp, 80-100 con is the minimum because we are melee, which is a big disadvantage (so are clerics, but most pvp clerics got either 30k hp anyway or have ausrine or some kind of invincibility)
seems like OP wants pure pvp performance
so yea, some con comes in handy
you don’t have to add str if you don’t like it, but not adding con for pvp is simply stupid.
You’ll just get 1 hit by a warlock or a musketeer (most archers got enough accuracy to be able to kill you, as we know archers get a very nice accuracy and dex bonus as it is their main stat)

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

just a bunch of text

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

You need a ton of STR to beat Stone Skin (and full con wizards w/ shields) even with Cata’s +40% block pen passive.

just a bunch of text

You can’t wait out stone skin. They’re always going to alternate it with safety zone, ausrine, healing factor, mackangdal, sterea strofh.

Stone Skin is actually the only time op cleric fags are not invincible, lol

just a bunch of text

You don’t need 500. You forget stone skin is nerfed in pvp to 400 block + .4 x SPR.