Well technically Iâd say he started it because he was the one who started AFKing in protest.
But letâs presume that he didnât at the beginning. When the 5 people first enter a dungeon, I think most of them would expect a full run. But your argument would be something along the lines of âBut it is okay for someone to suggest a boss rushâ.
I agree with this. At this stage, nobody is right or wrong. As you say, itâs about whether boss rush vs full run makes sense, and not about who is right or wrong. To decide which decision makes sense, the most practical way would be a majority vote, simply because in a dungeon setting, you need as many players as possible to clear the objective, so you need the majorityâs help to do so.
Then based on a majority vote of 4-1, they decided to go for a full run. They felt that this was sensible (subjectively, of course. whether it really is would not be what Iâm concerned with), and had the expectations for the participants to follow that.
Now at this stage, we can decide if someone is right or wrong based on their behaviour. If someone griefs the dungeon because they didnât get their way, then they would be âwrongâ because they didnât comply with the groupâs intention. E.g. AFKing, leaving, killing the boss prematurely.
Then this griefer would be the âone which started this fiascoâ.
Oh god I think Iâve went on for too long. But I wanted to illustrate my reasoning process.