hey, i don’t hate you. I posted because I was in doubt about that. I found the beautiful weapon because of the refinement effect. So…sorry if I went through a bad impression
It was the item (in this scenario a 0 potential Isbality) that I presumed to be moved around. Given that it was /not/ transcended and still tradable even with 0 potential. It was clearly pointed out and in no way/shape or form did I suggest that a Golden Anvil would be put into Team Storage and moved around.
Every single time, a response gets misunderstood despite it being clearly and concisely laid out… just… how?
Are you people treating this like Youtube? Reacting and commenting before you even start watching the video? (this is used to drive a point)
I asked if it is possible to move 0 potential item through team storage because I thought 0 potential items are supposed to be untradable. M.izu did replied saying it is possible. That’s all I want to know.
If that was really all you wanted to know, then you would not have made up (that’s right, you made it up) the idea that I even implied Golden Anvil(s) as tradeable.
I’m tired of people like you. I do my best to ensure my sentences are constructed properly and still, this sh*t happens.
Here’s what you said:
So don’t try to act high and mighty stating that’s “all you wanted”. You practically insinuated I suggested something that I did not.
Gold anvil is untradable and cannot be stored into team storage. Not sure what is your problem here. Tired of me? I wasnt even expecting a reply from you. One suggestion for you is next time if you wanna quote, quote properly. Don’t just quote some incomplete bits and pieces. I clearly asked if ‘Is that possible?’
1st sentence, I was clearly saying that the gold anvils are probably from the item owner’s other characters.
2nd sentence I clearly said "pass the item (not the anvil) via team storage ANDupgrade on whichever char has the gold anvil.
Your smart-ass response was (I would not have noticed if you didn’t hit Reply directly to my post mind you):
1st sentence: You’re trying to educate me on what I already f*cking know?F*ck you man! Did you read my post at all? Of course you didn’t, you’re an imbecile.
2nd sentence: If you actually bothered to readandunderstand what I said, you wouldn’t need to ask this stupid question.
3rd sentence: You got a response from @M.izu and that’s why there’s no need for me to reiterate.
I responded back with:
Get it yet? Your first response was to “point out” that Gold Anvil(s) were untradable.
#No sh*t, Sherlock… Thanks Einstein!
It’s not like I didn’t already know that.
It’s not even the idea behind my original post at all.
Given how clear and concise my first post was, I am extremely baffled as to how you misunderstood it.
I know, I know, it’s not like I’m going to win anything by doing what I did anyway. It’s one of those days, you write something nice and clean and completely thought out… somehow, someone still manages to misinterpret it. Worse, they have the balls to stand by their delusions.
It boggles the mind.
I didn’t write in ancient hieroglyphics after all. (insert “English motherf*cker! Do you speak it?” quote here)
I’m done ranting, had to let it out. It’s not like I do this everyday.
@Bald_Dad Aren’t you busy swatting the non-believers of DPK?
I think you had that one girl consistently reply to your posts (almost stalker-like) while claiming “not to care” / “not a believer” of what you’ve practically proven true in specific scenarios/items/cases.