Tree of Savior Forum

(C2-Diev3) MIKO-PD1-INQ viable? (instead of Kabba)

Class and Rank Cleric
#1

Hi, guys. Is that build viable at the late game?

It is a personal variation of “Kabba-Inq” one, that i like and respect, but i can’t give up on PD, I want a Inquisitor so I wont go PD2 forward.

Too much hybrid? Miko synergizes with Diev3 and Inq’s Wheel. And Malleus Maleficarum with Incineration and Hamaya. (I miss Ein Sof/R7F, but its still viable to me) And I still have Healing Factor.

Is it nonsense? Correct me if my logic is wrong. If any Inq/PD or Inq/Kabba could help me, I will be really grateful. Thanks!

#2

Well its not a bad build at all.
Whats the focus? Pve…pvp…dps? Both? U have good end game gears?

As u said u will trade revenge7 and ein for healing factor and incineration and can take some cc immunity.
Its evenly matched and it will give u some extra skill damage.

The problem will be on pvp…
Revenge7 takes out the stupidly full dps players who dont have strategy easily.
In other hand u will not depend on other players cc immunity buffs.

Is viable yes

1 Like
#3

At first PvE. But I want be good at Pvp and DPS to.

My only problem is about the stats. Inq is a “physical class”. So I have to make a hybrid distribution too, right?! With INT/CON build I still can have damage with Inq’s skills?

#4

Inq is a fisical class yes but nowdays good gear can actually compensate for status.
With end game hammer been vienarasis(focus phisical and good magical) or skull crusher(focus magic and good phisical)
With this is actually no need for int or str at all.

#5

But about the dodge issue. Being a INT Inquisitor will make my Breaking Wheel miss the damage against high level enemies?

#6

I use it with 9 dex and…it hit almost all times and my glove is magic amp…so i guess is not needed

When u find enemies who is hard to hit with whell just use miko kagura its sure to hit but its very rare to find